Sunday, March 7, 2010

10 Tough Questions with Integrity Commissioner Earl Basse

Please welcome our Integrity Commisoner, Earl Basse to The Hamiltonian's 10 Tough Questions. Earl- welcome to the Hamiltonian and welcome to Hamilton.

Comments to Earl's answers are welcome.

1. Much has been said about the fact that you are Hamilton’s Integrity Commissioner while remaining at your post as Windsor’s Integrity Commissioner, as well as , reportedly, running your own business. What do you say to people who may conclude that you would not be able to allot the time required in Hamilton? How will you balance these roles?
As in any business, meeting the needs of your clients is paramount. It is feasible and may be advantageous to perform the role of Integrity Commissioner for more than one municipality. The position for each municipality is not a full time position and has never been considered as such. Even Toronto’s Integrity Commissioner is not a full time position.

In the early stages, it takes considerable time to set up the Office of the Integrity Commissioner. However, once the office has been set up, the resources required to maintain it are not excessive. In addition, I have a number of associates that can assist if there is a need for additional personnel to perform the duties. Although I would still remain the Integrity Commissioner responsible for the Office of the Integrity Commissioner, the Municipal Act allows the Integrity Commissioner to delegate others to perform the duties. Investigations may be completed by other professional, licensed investigators but the final report to Council will be provided by me.

Also, I am accustomed to scheduling my time so that I am available for clients on short notice. In addition, my business as Basse & Associates Inc. is primarily focused on performing the role of Integrity Commissioner and providing other ethics and integrity consulting. I believe that performing the role for a variety of municipalities gives me value-added experience for the City of Hamilton.

2. You are charged with overseeing the conduct of Hamilton City Council with an Integrity lens and under the auspices of the provisions of your role. Who do you see as your client, separate and apart from who you receive
your pay from? Can you explain your translation?

I report to Council as a whole and serve at the pleasure of Council. However, I am independent of Council and Council is not my client. In my view my clients are the residents of the City of Hamilton who will benefit from my role.

3. Do you plan to use education as a means to prevent conduct that otherwise may be the subject of an investigation? Please explain.

The Integrity Commissioner performs four roles:

1. Provide advice and guidance to the Mayor and Council on matters relating to the Code of Conduct
2. Educate Council about ethics, integrity and the Code of Conduct
3. Review the Code of Conduct, its protocols and procedures and make recommendations to Council where appropriate
4. Investigate complaints of alleged violations of the Code of Conduct.

Education is an integral part of the role of the Integrity Commissioner. Being proactive and providing education and advice may prevent a violation of the Code of Conduct. It has been my experience that preventing violations of the Code of Conduct is far more cost-effective than investigating them. Part of my program for the City of Hamilton is to provide an Ethics Awareness Program within the municipality to assist Council to comply with the Code of Conduct.

4. What systems will your office have in place to handle the receipt, tracking and follow up of complaints to your office?

I currently use an informal manual system. I do not see a need to initiate a formal system. The volume of complaints does not warrant the initiation of a formal tracking system.

5. How will you assess proportional consequences to complaints that lead to a substantiated outcome? How will you exercise the scale available to you and ensure some degree of consistency?

The Integrity Commissioner By-Law allows me two (2) penalty options. I may impose a reprimand or a suspension of remuneration paid to the member in respect of the member’s services as a member of Council for a period of up to 90 days.

Each alleged complaint is different. Any penalty that is imposed is based on the facts of each case. Although there are no rules governing the imposition of penalties, consistency in rulings will result as only the Integrity Commissioner will be imposing the penalties.

6. Do you ever envision a need to deploy the services of an independent investigator (s), where cases are complex, or do you foresee that all complaints will be handled through you directly?

Each case is unique. I am a forensic accountant and have considerable experience conducting investigations in accordance with the rules of natural justice. For the most part, I do not see the necessity to engage other experts. However, depending on the investigation being conducted, I may have a need to engage the services of outside experts such as forensic document examiners or computer forensic professionals to assist in gathering evidence to support the final adjudication. I also may engage outside legal counsel to provide legal advice on matters that may be investigated.

7. Will there be an opportunity in the process to allow for mitigating factors, where a claim has been substantiated? If so, at what point in the process will that be allowed for, and what shape might it take?

Mitigating circumstances are considered at all stages in the investigation and form an integral part of the decision making process in coming to a final conclusion in any matter being addressed by the Integrity Commissioner. If a Councillor for example had inadvertently violated the Code of Conduct for the benefit of his constituents and without intent of personal benefit, those circumstances would be considered in the final disposition of the investigation.

8. Do you have a network available to you that might provide for peer review ? If so, do you envision tapping into that network on difficult cases?

The role of Integrity Commissioner is a new one in Ontario. It resulted from amendments to the Municipal Act (2006). Currently nine (9) municipalities have engaged the services of an Integrity Commissioner. Each municipality has different protocols and procedures in place for the Integrity Commissioner. In an effort to develop some consistency amongst all the municipalities and to assist each Integrity Commissioner to perform his/her duties, we all met in November 2009 for half a day in Toronto to discuss issues common to each. We all found this to be beneficial and have scheduled another meeting for April 2010. This is an excellent opportunity for us all to tap into the network to expand our knowledge and profit from the experience of others.

9. What is your commitment to Hamiltonians?

As noted earlier, my clients are Hamiltonians and I am fully committed to provide the best Integrity Commissioner services to them.

10. How will you know if you are successful? What performance measures are you working toward?
It would be nice to be like the Maytag Repair Man and be so successful in my position that there is nothing to do. However, that is not realistic. Council members must be active in their community and are responsible for making decisions that affect their constituents. Regardless of the decisions made, some constituents may not be happy with the outcome and may question the conduct of the Councillor and make a complaint. As a result, there will always be complaints to respond to. Thus, it is difficult to measure success by the number of complaints received.

In my view the most important aspect of the four (4) roles performed by the Integrity Commissioner is the role as a source to provide advice and guidance. I believe that the best measure of success is the number of calls I receive from Council members for advice and guidance prior to the member taking any action. Should these calls increase over the course of the year, than I believe the program has been successful.

Thank-you Earl for your contribution to The Hamiltonian and for being open to the questions.

13 comments:

  1. Way to go Cal, at least you got a response from Mr. Basse, unlike yours truely.

    I'm waiting for his report on the Terry Whitehead complaint, or the one I sent him weeks ago, that he completely ignored respecting disseminating information from in-camera meetings to the local media.

    At least Andre Marin, the Ontario Ombudsman takes this matter seriously, as should we all.

    I'm glad to know he works for me, the poor sap paying the freight. Who woulda' thunk it?

    Next time I see a blatant Code of Conduct breach I will just ignore it, until I get to the ballot box this fall.

    Sorry to rant, but I always reply to people who contact me, unlike Mr. Basse. Being the only registered Lobbyist in town, I'm not impressed at all.

    That's Hamilton, get used to it, or get out and vote.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Cal
    I would agree with Mark to a certain extent. the responses were a little lack luster. Seemed pretty cut and dry form his perspective.
    Hopes the job produces little work, not into tracking complaints and processes, has other folks who can do the work if he's not into it...
    I dunno - seemed kind of distant...
    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. Maybe he doesnt know how busy he will be here. A lot to do my friend.
    2.serve at the pleasure of council huh? hmm
    3. a lob quewstion
    4. ha ha ha
    5. didnt get the whole queswtion did he Cal?
    6. guess who's paying
    7. cool
    8. ho hum
    9. lame man. very lame
    10
    . Funny. No clue on how to know if he's doing a good job

    I ain't impressed yet.

    Elvis P.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Question #3 reply pretty well sums it up. No where in his view of the role of Integrity Commissioner does it include that he is obligated to reveal to the the taxpayers that pay his fees any lack of integrity he finds. Council will just go in camera and reveal what it wants to. He considers council as his employer and us poor taxpayer only as clients. In Question #8 he says 9 municipalities have an Integrity Commissioner and he holds that position for 2. I am sure he is probably on the short list for many more since it looks like he is just an accomplice in cover ups. If he had any integrity he would resign and make a report to taxpayers all the flaws in the position he holds. But then again he would have to find a real job. Mayor Fred you got the man you wanted.
    ReplyDelete
  5. Using associates of his company is a great way to pad the bill. If I am not mistaken Earl Basse was hired as Hamilton's Integrity Commissioner not Basse&Associates. Mayor Fred you are invited to give us your comments. I am sure you or your campaign committee is checking this site out.
    ReplyDelete
  6. We have just swallowed the "placebo integrity pill" Don't you feel better now!
    ReplyDelete
  7. Mr. Basse, unfortunately I found your answers to be uninspiring, underwhelming and unconvincing. Youll fit in just right with present council. Just another on the payroll. I would like to see the candidates that Mr. Bassee beat out. His answer to question 9 said it all. Terrible
    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm glad I'm not the only Hamiltonian scratching my head over this one. He's a tad too arrogant and lofty, IMHO, which fits right in with councils attitude towards Hamilton taxpayers, like we are a bottomless pit of money to be plundered at will. One can only hope this angst gets people to get out and vote as we get the government we deserve. It is our civic duty to vote, let's do it!
    ReplyDelete
  9. Brian Henley +Mar 8, 2010 07:41 AM
    I'd agree with the previous posts on this.
    I really doubt that this individual can, or will, do anything to monitor or improve the performance of Hamilton City Councillors.
    There already has been a blatant breaking of the Code of Conduct as regards Closed Door Meeting confidentiality.
    I asked before and assume my opinion is right - nothing would be done unless a citizen complaint with the financial risks involved is made.
    A very disappointing series of responses to the questions.
    Am I wrong or is this the only public comment by this individual on anything except for the flurry of interviews when he was first appointed.
    After all this time waiting for the Integrity Commissioner position to be appointed and the only thing to show is this tepid set of answers?
    Bizarre.
    ReplyDelete
  10. Ten Rougher Questions

    Citizen Jurors? An Integrity Commish? Shouldn´t councillors just be doing their jobs? Isn´t that our plain & simple wish working slobs?

    What did we elect them for anyway, now that we must play nursemaids and nannies? What do they do there all day, that we must watch their behinds or paddle their fannies?

    I am weary of men with arm's length long titles that answer tough questions like grade school recitals. I want fearless leadership that doesn't need second guessing. I want to see strong courageous men not wimpy window dressing.

    Where are the men with grit in their teeth? Men cool overhead with fire underneath! Where are the champions for our city on the rocks? Were they crawling with Matt surveying the blocks? I don't think so.

    What we got is three's dressed up like a nine and come Halloween, IT's judgement time, don't ya know?
    ReplyDelete
  11. Ten Rougher Questions

    Citizen Jurors? An Integrity Commish? Shouldn´t councillors just be
    doing their jobs? Isn´t that our plain & simple wish working slobs?

    What did we elect them for anyway, now that we must play nursemaids and
    nannies? What do they do there all day, that we must watch their
    behinds or paddle their fannies?

    I am weary of men with arm's length long titles that answer tough
    questions like grade school recitals. I want fearless leadership that
    doesn't need second guessing. I want to see strong courageous men not
    wimpy window dressing.

    Where are the men with grit in their teeth? Men cool overhead with fire
    underneath! Where are the champions for our city on the rocks? Were
    they crawling with Matt surveying the blocks? I don't think so.

    What we got is three's dressed up like a nine and come Halloween, IT's
    judgement time, don't ya know?
    ReplyDelete
  12. I'd agree with the previous posts on this.
    I really doubt that this individual can, or will, do anything to
    monitor or improve the performance of Hamilton City Councillors.
    There already has been a blatant breaking of the Code of Conduct as
    regards Closed Door Meeting confidentiality.
    I asked before and assume my opinion is right - nothing would be done
    unless a citizen complaint with the financial risks involved is made.
    A very disappointing series of responses to the questions.
    Am I wrong or is this the only public comment by this individual on
    anything except for the flurry of interviews when he was first
    appointed.
    After all this time waiting for the Integrity Commissioner position to
    be appointed and the only thing to show is this tepid set of answers?
    Bizarre.
    ReplyDelete
  13. Where are the reports on the water treatment plant boondoggle? Has the Integrity Commissioner put them under the carpet to be dusted off after the election? Hopefully with all the associates he has he can come back here and tell us how soon he will be reporting to his clients on this, the issue with councillor Whitehead and the abuse of in camera meetings
    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.


Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.