Tuesday, December 15, 2009
10 Tough Questions with 820 Talk's Dave Shuttleworth
1. In terms of relativity, how would you compare this present council with the last, in terms of effectiveness, performance and good stewardship? Please explain your answer.
This council clearly has trouble getting along, and Mayor Fred has not done anything about it. If he had taken a hard line at the beginning of this council, perhaps the attitudes of councillors toward the Mayor would be different. Fred needs to fire a shot across the bow sometimes. And, on that note, the councillors in wards 2, 4, 5, 8 and 9 should watch out if and when he does! The only time Fred did take a councilor to task in public was on my show. He publicly scolded Ward 8 Councillor Terry Whitehead on my show over a supposed conversation with Gary Bettman after Hamilton had been denied an NHL team for the umpteenth time. It was such a big deal that CHCH was calling for the clip!
2. As a radio talk show host, you must have a pretty good sense of how Hamiltonians feel about how our municipal council is serving us. Can you summarize what you are hearing and what the common themes or feedback has been.
Admittedly, it’s still the same-old “those politicians just want to get re-elected” attitude. I have heard concerns that councillors are “lifers.” Oh and my personal favourite: They don’t care about us, they’re just trying to further their careers! I think that there is a problem with the question, because there might be a citizen who is very happy with their councillor, but they will never call a talk show about it. Nor, will they email me to say “That councillor from Ward (?) is doing a heck of a job. As a host, I can get a better perspective by calling city officials, talking with callers and reading other media. Callers alone will, very often, only give me one perspective. That’s not necessarily bad, but it is not balanced.
3. Do you believe that Hamilton continues to be in a rut, but is doing more on the marketing front to convince us otherwise, or are you seeing signs of Hamilton turning itself around?
I’m so gad that you’ve asked that question. Yes. Back in 2004, when I was on the now-defunct “Opinionators” on cable 14, I ask: “If you were going to have a party, would you clean up the front lawn but not the rest of the house? No, you wouldn’t.” That’s what Hamilton has been doing consistently, particularly with the downtown. How many millions did we pay for the interlocking brick at King and Wellington? The overhanging signs too? For what? We rolled out the red carpet into the same old dump that we were ashamed of before. We could earmark 100% of our budget for our “marketing strategy,” but it wouldn’t make any difference if we increased the amount of subsidized housing in the core. Granted, that’s only one issue. The “Waterfalls Capital” campaign is well-intentioned but it’s too far-fetched. Perhaps we do have the most waterfalls localized in one geographical region….but other than a core group of dedicated hikers, can Chris Ecklund, who owns the trademark, no one cares. I bet you didn’t know that Hamilton was once proclaimed “Canada’s Country Music Capital.” That designation hasn’t really served us well, has it?
Hamilton will never be successful by branding itself the “(insert moniker here) Capital” Funny enough, Hamilton’s true appeal to the outside comes in a form that we don’t need to market. Out real estate is very attractive to the Toronto set. This is good news that will spread without any marketing dollars whatsoever. In addition, it is a call to revamp our core infrastructure of road, rail and transit. As Canada’s 9th largest city, we can not and should not be relying on gimmicks!
4. Why do you think so few people vote in Hamilton municipal politics and what can be done to increase the turn out?
I don’t think that voter turnout is a problem that is unique to Hamilton. Municipalities across the country often complain of low voter turnout – somewhere in the area of 35%. Sure, municipal politics isn’t as sexy as federal or provincial politics but it has always amazed me, the low turnout, that is. Civic politics is where the proverbial “rubber meets the road.” We vote least for the individuals who can affect us most. We can’t punish citizens for not voting. They will be punished for electing (or not electing, for that matter) the group of councillors that they will! In the past there have been calls for civic tests or full exams to be taken in order for potential voters to get the right to vote. But that will only diminish the already low numbers!
5. Mayor Eisenberger won by a slim margin over former Mayor Di Ianni. Having seen both lead this city, do you think we are better off under the current leadership, at the Mayoral level? Please explain.
I think I have a unique perspective, having seen both govern, knowing both men very well, and having run for council during that historic election. This goes back to my first answer. Fred does not stand up for himself in the way that Larry did. Take for example the Maple Leaf plant proposal during the last council. When Council turned it down Larry took the rest of council to task for such a lost opportunity. I can’t say if the city is “better off” under one or the other, but there clearly was a more cohesive council under DiIanni.
6. What do you read into the extraordinary length of time it is taking to hire an Integrity Commissioner? Do you think an Integrity Commissioner will make a difference?
I can’t speak to the length of time it has taken to secure an integrity commissioner. I don’t know how to go and find one. I will say this: He or she would have had a field day on this council already! It’s ridiculous to think that council can pass judgment on their own, especially given the track record of some of them.
7. Do you believe in term limits for city council? Please explain.
No. Term limits are not a solution to voter apathy! This might go back to an earlier answer, but with less than half the eligible electorate turning out, it’s really our own fault for keeping a “Lifer” in there. I would like to think that, in a democracy, we could control that problem. We also have to consider – as funny as it might sound given the comments that I have made thus far - that there are councillors who are doing a good job on behalf of their constituents and those people should not be restricted by term limits.
8. What was the most challenging on air experience you have had. Please describe the circumstances.
This is a strange question. I’ll answer it in two parts.
Every on-air experience is a challenge. It needs to be interesting, compelling and thought-provoking. In this era of instant communication and on-demand media it is quite challenging to convince anyone to listen to a new AM radio station. The best compliment that I can get is when someone says “I stayed in my car and listened to you the other day.” To think that someone would delay their plans to listen!? I like to be up to that challenge everyday.
On a personal level, it is always very challenging to go on the air when I am dealing with a personal matter. I am not in a business where I can go to work and just keep my head down and “mind my own business.” For as real as the topics are, in the end I have to put on a show not matter what kind of mood I am in.
9. Who would you say is or was the most effective Hamilton politician or community leader. Why did you pick that person?
Cal, You don’t expect me to name just one, do you? OK, Me! For explanation see above! Ha!
10. People, especially politicians, talk about "The Next Hamilton". Are we making progress toward a new version of Hamilton, or are we still stuck in the ditch?
I don’t think that we’re ever “stuck in the ditch.” Perhaps it’s a rut…or a crevasse…you can find a crevasse near a waterfall, right? Anyway, where was I? Oh yes, The Next Hamilton. Look, it’s encouraging to see progress. The Pan-Am games, Light-Rail, Downtown Renewal (well, they’re moving the bus stops, at least). These are issues that we have talked about for years and we are finally seeing movement on them. We have to face facts that it takes forever sometimes to accomplish these goals…Red Hill Expressway…anyone? Conversely, Hamilton has to stop this thinking that subsidized housing is the answer to all of our problems. In the last year alone the city has proposed two subsidized housing projects in the downtown core (2 that I am aware of, perhaps more). This is not sustainable. There is only so much money that we can give to the poor before it is no longer an investment, and I believe that we have past that point. Voters in Hamilton should consider their vote before they send the slate of NDP candidates to Ottawa and Queen’s Park. Hamilton is more than just the poor and that should be recognized.
11. Are you optimistic that the Pan Am games will be good for Hamilton, in a sustainable way?
Yes, I am. Look, I’ll be the first to admit that we’ll probably be way over budget and Hamilton will not get half the attention that it thinks it will get since these are Toronto’s games. But to think that we might get a new stadium and all of the residual benefits even a few years before the games open, that’s very positive. The land would sit empty for however many more years if we didn’t get this opportunity, so let’s jump on it while we can.
Thanks Dave for your contribution to The Hamiltonian and for your interest in Hamilton. You can visit Dave's web page and see his on air schedule by clicking here
9 comments:
Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.
Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.
Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.

This is a test... Just kidding, I got that from
ReplyDeleteThe Dave Shuttleworth Show - [blog]
No really, you're in good company Mr. Shuttleworth.
The Coast to Coast show with George Noory is a good
one. Some of the talk show hosts I listen to have
been guests on C2C; James McCanney, Steve Quayle,
Alex Jones, etc. Too bad it's past my bedtime.
So is [this one].
Are your shows archived?
How effective is local talk radio BTW? I mean
how can you know your listener-ship without
callers? Do you have any clue how many
listen to the show at 2:00pm? Would
it be similar to a local blog of
say about 50 to 100 or 1000?
What is the demographic?
I share your opinion on TQ 6 & 7 as we will
soon see. I have many more questions than
comments for a man like Mr. Shuttleworth.
Perhaps someday we'll meet at a Hamilton
"standard" and chew the phat. I liked
the Opinionators and the Avengers!
Thanks for sharing Dave and I
hope you'll run again someday.
Hi Dave: Can't say that I have actually listened to your show. I usually have the CBC on in the vehicle.
ReplyDeleteAffordable housing is an issue in this city, it may not affect you personally but many struggle. Check out the video on Tom Cooper's post done by the Mac students, you will see some of the housing conditions people who struggle are faced with.
I agree that housing is not the only solution, the people need jobs and ones that pay living wages, offer benefits, pensions would be nice too.
Many voters are disengaged, low income, renters, immigrants, newcomers. This is what we have to change, their thinking that their vote does count for something.
I see that you do not necessarily like the NDP, well let me ask you a question, what makes you think that either the liberals or conservatives are better?
We must invest in those that struggle, this was the message that Mr Strickland brought to Hamilton, to view all people as assets and not liabilities. It is the system and not the people, many do want to move forward.
Many workers have no representation, those who are caught in precarious work situations where our employment laws fail them. This is a project that I am working on with others. People/workers need to learn how to come together to fight for change, for fairness and justice. Remember now all those things like vacation time, weekends, health and safety, benefits, pensions, were hard fought by workers before us and sometimes some people take that for granted, while others have fallen by the wayside.
Over 100,000 struggle in this city and those numbers could of jump with the all the job losses, as EI rates climb 150% in one year and some of those people may not find work, may be forced to be strip of their assets, just to access services.
All the voices must be represented and be counted as equal!
Hi Dave, I remember that election in ward seven, my son passed away that year, no wonder I came last in a field of eight candidates.
ReplyDeleteComing in third is nothing to sneeze at, that's for sure. I hope you give it another go.
Fortunately Scott Duvall's fiefdom is well in hand, although this ward could use a "Community Council" as the City of Hamilton Act allows and other wards already officialy have, thanks to the initiatives of their elected member of council.
Provincial and Federal politics can certainly colour the locals, know what I mean Dave?
Thanks for sharing your views on Hamilton, boondoggles we got. Just kidding, I think?
Hey Cal,
ReplyDeleteGreat interview!! Keep er coming!!
Rick Cordeiro
Michelle Hruschka said...
ReplyDelete"Affordable housing is an issue in this city, it may not affect you personally but many struggle."
Not only is affordable housing a very real problem, but the whole issue of property standards, and the lax system that is purported to regulate such standars, is an abomination in this city. Quite often we have situations where housing is really not affordable, like for students living around the university, but the slumlords do little if nothing to do any upkeep. The whole district is turning into a ghetto, with uncut grass, falling apart houses, issues of too many students stuffed into a house, etc.
So on one hand we have a level of rent that is far too high, perhaps prompted by exorbitant property taxes that are funneled into worthless white elephants of all sorts, or simply wasted; but we also have the very real problem of absentee landlords who simply want to score profits and could care less about the conditions that their buildings are in. In fact, this is a very real problem, because "improvements" made to properties end up costing large in increased, market assessed tax ratings, while the slumlords end up with lower taxes, and more profits because not only do they pay less taxes, they don't bother with maintenance or anything.
This is a systemic problem that the City simply can't figure out, or doesn't want to figure out, a proper solution for. Nor do they bother to actually enforce their existing rules of property standards. This isn't just a problem with student slum housing - it affects all kinds of buildings, with landlords that see fit to shut off heat and hydro in order to score profits, or to be lax in repairs and maintenance in order to score some fast cash. We just simply need to enforce what we have now by creating a proper and functional system, before we start letting the City go on to pass yet more bylaws that they won't enforce either.
Michelle Hruschka said...
ReplyDelete"I agree that housing is not the only solution, the people need jobs and ones that pay living wages, offer benefits, pensions would be nice too."
This is an example of how once again, the City and the Governments have failed in their tasks. One of the big impediments for any kind of progress is the fact that unproductive land simply goes unused. One can, if they wanted to, actually purchase the Studebaker factory - a concern that has been underused or empty for forty-five years. It indicates a systemic problem, when such areas which would be entirely be attractive to business, located near railroads, port facilities, highways - that can draw on an ample and educated workforce, goes unused. And it is not just one building, we have entire districts with buildings unused, or of land wasted; locations that at one time had employed hundreds or thousands in gainful employment.
Instead, we have a Council that wants to build taj mahals in locations far away from the City, out in distant fields, tens of miles away from anything resembling transit. And because it takes far too long to gain approvals and such, most companies simply wander away and locate elsewhere, hence the tens of thousands of people that are forced into working at distant jobs, commuting and hence, polluting the environment.
We have been witness to countless scandalous activities within the City.
Of companies that located here only to face huge "development" charges that are at least a magnitude higher than other areas in the province. We also witness a City that loves to pawn off the same, tired old "five acres in Flamborough" tripe. Real business can't do anything with a cheezy five acres - that is barely the visitors parking at Toyota. And that is a prime example of opportunity lost, for Toyota brought tons of business to places like Cambridge and Woodstock; while the racists of this City simply ignored the long list of "Foreign" companies that were attracted by those things that had originally attracted the industrialists of another age.
Of companies railroaded, like when Samsung expressed interest in the Camco plant because of it's ideal location for such business, only to end up disgusted, and the land turned over to an empty building that employs zero people, and across the road, land for the university that simply will not employ many, if any, actual Hamiltonians.
As Hamiltonians, we have to take back that which is ours, to put into place a system where at least, say, a company can get information and perhaps a guided tour; and then if they remain interested, not to have those companies constantly railroaded and impeded by the NIMBYists and special interests, as well as making sure that those people within the City itself are not attempting some kind of corrupt scheme or pocket filling glad handling for their own profits.
If places like Brantford can load up on profitable industries and businesses, then why can't we even attempt to do so? And we need to make sure these businesses are going to be located in the heart, near where people live and where people can easily commute to - because plowing under some remote farmland miles away simply will not lead to any real solution to any of our problems.
Hi anonymus:
ReplyDeleteI agree that plowing under precious farmland is simply ridiculous. Food Security issues are very prevalent in our community. We should be growing food to feed our own. We should be supporting the local farmers as well, as many of them struggle. We at the CAWDB have advocated for more community gardens and even green houses, which could be turned into a viable business, with some thought and planning.
We can also see that our council does not reflect to true make of diversity in our community.
Not everyone is destined for higher education, yet we have created a stigma that those who may not have education, are destined in live a life in poverty. What about those who come here who are educated, yet are denied work or it takes a very long time for them to get recognized in their perspective fields?
Mayor Eisenberger, in his platform in the last election was around redeveloping the brownfields, which we have seen no movement really in this area.
People cannot survive on minimum wage jobs and try to raise a family. In fact a group of teachers spoke at the CAWDB's foum on poverty and health and at the transit meeting:
[poverty and health].
[teachers and health providers speaking].
Maybe part of the problem is those who work in city hall, who lack real vision.
We should be welcoming, talking, sharing, promoting but I just do not see that coming from city hall. They are fixed on certain things, which does little for most of the population. One only has to look at the furloined faces of desparation and hopelessness.
My background is in accounting, so I do understand that side of things but my personal experiences as a worker have led me to pursue studies in labour and Occupational Health and Safety. I think that it is important that all sides sit and discuss.
In my view of things, a happy worker, is one that is included, that their views could be considered important to the overall success of a business. I mean look at this way, a worker operates a machine. Yet in most cases,a business will rely on a paper pusher, a number cruncher to make decisions. Who would know more about the operation of said machine? Should that workers opinion be included?
Change is so desparately needed!
A video posted by a fellow Hamiltonian:
ReplyDeleteSlum lord
[slum lord].
The tenants lost at the housing tribunal!
Here is another example of a slumlord, people trying to start a business:
[Bricks Falling].
Hey Micjhele K. Forget the grow our own food thing. The term limit poster children from the Creek -Pearson and Mitchell, with the help of our illustrious mayor, sold out our ability to grow food, by votonmg for the ridiculous Walmart in Winona idea. How are farmer's going to compete with the might W. We've been SOLD OUT. Cut those union and corporate donations and get rid of the driftwood.
ReplyDelete