Friday, December 4, 2009

10 Tough Questions with Chris Farias


Imaginitarian and Partner, Chris Farias is a Hamiltonian entrepreneur and owner of kitestring creative marketing + design.

Now in kitestring`s third year of business, Chris acts as Creative Director on all campaigns with his knack for creating unique identities and on-target brand awareness. He has a stellar background in print design, illustration and art direction. Chris also brings over 9 years experience in brand development to kitestring.

Chris enjoys fostering his community, and thoroughly believes that Hamilton is a city that is comprised of intriguing young people who are changing it for the better. Chris acts as President of the James South District, is actively involved in the Art Gallery of Hamilton`s Clic board and founded HYPE, the Hamilton young professionals and entrepreneurs group. Welcome to 10 Tough Questions with Chris Farias.

1.You act as President of the James South District. Can you describe what that means and what type of initiatives you are involved in, in the James South area?

The James South District was started by a few local business owners who wanted to make the area they lived and worked in the best liveable space possible. I have lived and work in this area for five and a half years. With the James South District, I work with a dedicated board focusing on cleanliness in the community and providing a forum of communication between the businesses in the area. The James South District is not looking to compete with James North, who does such a fantastic job at branding itself as the arts and culture centre of the city. This year, we’ve started to look at re-branding the James South District as a restaurant hot-spot in Hamilton, giving it its own unique character as a place to provide a variety of culinary experiences from French bistros, Ethiopian cuisine to seafood pubs. With both sides of James working together, we can enhance the downtown experience for all.

2.What are the challenges and opportunities on James S?

The challenges that present themselves on James South occur due in part because a large majority of people who come to the area during their nine to five gig often leave the area when the 5 o'clock whistle blows instead of staying to enjoy the community. There are huge opportunities present to feature this area as the place to venture out for relaxing dinner or an after work drink in Hamilton.

3.You are described as someone who “believes that Hamilton is a city that is comprised of intriguing young people who are changing it for the better”. In the face of very poor voter turn out in the last election, what type of things could be done to inspire young people, or all people for that matter, to take a greater vested interest in local politics?

Young people who are passionate about the city are going to alter its landscape whether they are vested in politics or not. And we shouldn’t expect young people to actively participate when they aren’t even included in the initial conversations.

To engage young people in activity you have to find out where they are having conversations and then participate in them using language they can relate to.

As a young person in Hamilton, I have never been exposed to messaging about when, where or why it is important to vote. Young people are on the internet... a lot. They’re not looking at signs on suburban lawns, or even necessarily reading traditional newspapers.

Obama used twitter, facebook and appearances on t.v., like the Jon Stewart Show, to reach a younger audience.

Messaging for a Boomer audience about the importance of voting should be entirely different that for Generation Y, and so should the medium.

4.Creativity appears to be large part of the business you are in. Has Hamilton been creative enough in marketing itself? What other approaches might we use to that end?

There are some really creative, talented and intelligent people managing to create some serious pockets of amazing buzz and activity around town. I’m not convinced that the city is doing its best to really capture the essence of this energy in their marketing.

There is a lot to be said for a little market research. If these creative, talented and intelligent people were polled using the right questions, I’m sure that themes would be present in regards to their idea of what the city of Hamilton is to them. I know that some departments are investing in market research trying to tap into this voice, and I’m interested to see what the marketing results will be.

5.You founded HYPE, the Hamilton young professionals and entrepreneurs group. When you consider how this city is run, at the political and bureaucratic levels, what impression does that leave with young professionals and entrepreneurs.

As I said earlier, I think that young people in this town are not included in the conversation, and if anything, feel that their opinions are an untapped resource. Tap that resource Hamilton.

6.What can we do as a city, to further encourage, channel and leverage the energy and new ideas that young people bring? Or do you believe that channels and opportunities are available and are being utilized?

Here’s the thing: You have no right to eat the tomato unless you help to grow it. Unfortunately for Hamilton, Toronto loves buying our juicy tomatoes.

The city has no right to “leverage” talent they cannot properly foster.

There should be a focus on how we can attract and retain bright, young people by providing more opportunities for meaningful employment. There are obvious benefits for these types of young people being here.

Walk into any book store in this city and ask the young person working there what subject they studied for their Masters degree. We have smart people in this city. Give them an opportunity to use those smarts here, or you leave them no choice but to vamoose.

I know we’re a mustard town, but we’ve got to start bottling more ketchup.

7.Is the business model for people who work in the creative arts, different than a “regular” business model, from the perspective of requirements? What are the nuances or differences, if any, with respect to what the requirements would be?

I work in the creative media and marketing industry, which is a little different than selling a manufactured product, so naturally these business models should differ. kitestring sells creativity, talent and expertise.

The only difference between our business and a lawyer’s for example, is the lack of general public understanding of our services and how important they are to help organizations do what they do even better.

8.Your firm has expertise in employing imagination, to create, brand and re-brand. By way of this question, I am asking you to huddle up with your group and paint a picture of what downtown Hamilton could grow to be. Describe it 5 years from now, in accordance with an imaginative vision your group might conjure up.

We imagine that in five years,

...Hamilton is a lot easier for people to get around using greener transportation.

... a lot less people are commuting out of the city to work.

... there are less boarded up buildings and more revitalized businesses downtown.

... that more people live in the downtown core.

... that Hamiltonians view their poor, sick or homeless as equal members of the community that deserve better options.

...Hamiltonians finally see what this city has to offer and stand up as advocates for the city when they encounter a negative perception of it.

These answers are not exactly creative, but the vehicle to get there has to be a creative one.

9.What needs to happen to realize the results of question 8?

There would need to be a shift in the minds of a lot of people who live here. It has been my experience that people who have moved here from elsewhere say the best things about Hamilton. A lot of Hamiltonians have a Monet perception of the city because they only focus on narrow portions of it from a short distance. If these people backed up a bit, they could see the beautiful picture.

10.If you had the undivided attention of all Hamiltonian’s for 5 minutes, what would you say to them, in terms of how to contribute to moving our city forward?

I don’t think that having the undivided attention of all Hamiltonians at once for five minutes would be very impactful because it would be impossible to inspire a 65 year old woman and a 13 year old boy with the same message.

What I might do is tell the crowd of Hamiltonians to turn to their left and meet the person beside them. The only way to get to know Hamilton is through knowing its people.

We are a city of great people.

Thanks Chris for your interest in Hamilton. Visit Kitestring Creative Marketing and Design by clicking here

9 comments:

  1. Michelle HruschkaDec 5, 2009 04:46 AM
    Welcome Chris: You are right that we have some great people in this city.

    I like your attitude or vision that those who struggle should be seen as equals, that deserve better. This is the message that needs to marketed to the public. They must be seen as assets and not liabilities.

    Many who are low income actively do much volunteering to get their voices out their, so they can be heard. There are many not only in the city but across the province that are getting those people who struggling the opportunity to learn the skills to speak publically about the life, so that a change can occur. This is grassroots organizing and they are gaining not only a voice but soon they could be part of the decision making process.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Kitestring Eh? Is that like the fine thread
    which anchors a banner or flag to IT's flier?

    I remember threading a kitestring through two cups
    and tying a dot on either end, then pulling them
    taught to make a primitive communication device.

    This city needs to start making things again.
    Things we use often if not every day. There is
    no reason why we cannot have products labeled
    with the Made in Hamilton/Made in Canada brand name.

    My daughter is in McMaster's Studio Fine Arts program
    for the second year. She loves to work with fibres and
    is now making Thrum Mittens. The big thing about thrums
    is the need for roving material. Roving is raw unspun
    wool and the closest place she could acquire the
    material was Uruguay. Canadian wool is available
    but the roving is what makes the thrums so warm.

    Wool is the most ancient fibre known to man.
    Wool is the only material which has been proven
    to control body temperature against the cold,
    the heat and even in water. Noah lined the
    animal stalls on the ark with felted wool.

    The thrum mittens are often referred to as
    the Newfoundland mittens and are so warm
    and fuzzy that it makes you wonder why
    they are not a mainstay item in cold
    Canadian regions. I cannot find the
    thrum mittens in any local stores.

    In ancient times, the women and
    young girls worked with wool.
    They made things for their
    friends and family. Some
    were enterprising enough
    that they were able to sell
    their goods for a profit. Our
    artisan makes thrums for $35.
    I paid her $50 for my pair.
    She has to pay for her
    education somehow
    so why knot?

    Thanks for sharing Chris Farias
    ReplyDelete
  3. Golden Chris, Golden! Fine words from a fine man!
    ReplyDelete
  4. Chris pretty much states what many state. Success in Hamilton will entirely depend upon bringing some jobs to town. And I am not talking about some fancy-schmancy jobs that are only available to those that have fifteen PhDs in the obscure, and not endless "call centers" that yield little more than sub-poverty wages.

    We need the jobs that regular people can do, with repurposed land that attract progressive minded businesses that want to compete.

    We need to have a City Hall that can refrain from excessive "development charges" - or at least refrain from those charges when it comes to redeveloping land that has been long abandoned.

    We need a City Hall that can work to attract forieng manufacturers, since it is the Japanese and Korean companies that know how to compete and use technology. These companies bring in massive numbers of jobs, and places like Cambridge and Woodstock are going concerns.

    Going Green is an important aspect, but can only be attained when we start gaining practical, real jobs in this City. Affordable and reliable transit is important, and we have taken some small baby steps. It is sad that HSR service is far less timely than it was thirty years ago - when fares were less and the buses were full. When one has to wait a half hour for a bus, there is little attraction, and people will simply use the car because it is timely. Parking is also a problem, with lots of people living in the suburbs. Perhaps large car pool lots in key places, connected with reliable express bus routes, would allow people to get to and from downtown without cars, thus allowing us to start building stuff on the land that is now dedicated to overpriced and endless parking lots.

    It would be nice to have the vision that Chris holds, that we can accomplish things within five years; but with the pace our Council and our Governments take, perhaps fifty years is more appropriate...
    ReplyDelete
  5. fifty years?! I love this city. I have spent too much energy already constantly defending it, appealing to others to see it the way I do.... but I'm tired of waiting. The vibrant city of my youth is gone. I can't wait for it to revitalize.... So long, Steeltown.
    ReplyDelete
  6. ^^^
    It is predicated on the fact that it does take time to do things. To have an integrated city with proper infrastructure that caters to public transit, bicycles, car pooling, jobs located within walking distances of residences, etc. will all take time. However, all of these things are stymied by the byzantine system of governance, and the way that projects happen to explode into scandals and corruption in a frighteningly regular way.

    Of course, we can not blame the current Council for these things - since they have attempted to work around these things. Parochialism is at a low these days, and though we gripe, there has been much positive progress. I think that the announcement that the City Hall project is below budget and ahead of schedule is quite an improvement - whether you like the new cladding or not - simply because in the past, such projects would have had a budget that was blown out by at least double, and three years behind schedule.

    The root of our problems are systematic. We do not have clear "development fees", or justification for those fees. Some buildings sprout up without permits and in odd locations, while other projects end up endlessly derailed in red tape and NIMBYism.

    I thought that the City needing to go through a whole process of "environmental review" to simply replace a bridge out on the 8th Concession of Flamborough was nonsense - while no effort is spent in preventing the building of endless hosuing projects on unsafe, karst-infested grounds un Upper Stoney Creek.

    On one had, we have a Council that talks the talk about "green" and "environmental": while on one hand, having a system in place that prevents the maintenance of existing infrastructure like bridges and roads (which leads to massive, enercy and time wasting detours); while on the other, fostering unbridled connurbation on distant land that has no chance of ever obtaining anything like public transit, housing that is entirely car accessible only, that caters to the current mentality of shipping tens of thousands of people to distant jobs on a daily basis.

    This kind of mess is not easily fixed - though it should not deter the efforts, because efforts directed properly will bring to bear political pressure for proper reforms of the system. We need to stop dreaming of the mega-projects that provide salvation, but rather, start doing the little things right.

    We need to have a viable downtown core, which not only means having workplaces and places to live, but also to have shopping, like grocery stores, which is something really lacking in the downtown. We also need to consider that we will continue to have a large number of commuters into the downtown, so we will need to have stuff like car pool lots where people can park at a distance, for free, and have some kind of efficient transit in place - something that is more timely than driving around looking for parking in the downtown. We have lots of parking lots downtown, empty lots that provide no employment, and hence, half of them could be entirely ripped out and replaced with places to work and live.

    All of this takes time, so thinking we can achive this in five years will simply lead to disappointment. However, we should not give up on that vision, and really, we should be able to measure real, practical progress within five years - while working towards a target of fifty years in order to have a restored, proper, post-modern city that is sustainable and as green as possible, with real employment for real people, and a massive decrease in poverty, and far less relaince on automobiles.
    ReplyDelete
  7. I think the answer to our problems is to take people like Chris, with new ideas, seriously. I think council is out of touch, out of date, and soon- out of time.

    The Thinker
    ReplyDelete
  8. Great to hear what others are doing and saying about the neighbourhood I live in.

    One thing I should say, that I think can be associated with the 9-5 crowd that leaves the area as soon as the work day ends, is the one thing that James South is lacking is a work-friendly coffee shop that stays open past the dinner hour. I find I, and other young professionals, are forced to leave the area to get out of the house with laptop in hand to do work, travelling either to the library, Locke, James North or Westdale.
    ReplyDelete
  9. To the previous Anon:

    We do not have a problem with ideas. There are tons of good ideas, and there are no lack of ears to receive them within the City. Again, it is a systemic problem, where one can have a huge heap of excellent ideas, all bashed to pieces by a dysfunctional system that railroads the good ideas (mostly because they do not provide salvation), while shovelling tons of cash into bad ideas (mostly because they promise instant gratification). One only need to look at the current successes that the City has - all are grassroots, all are run on shoestrings, and all teeter on failure because the lack of resources simply can not succeed against the systemic machine that destroys good ideas. It's all about grabbing fash cash and catering to the very cliques that have ruined the City and challenge it at every turn.

    Jessica has an entirely valid point. James South lacks a draw, especially cafes that cater to todays tastes with a casual attitude and WiFi - all stuff that attracts people to places like Williams down on the waterfront, or Starbucks over on Locke. The problems with keeping people downtown in the evenings include: the lack of timely transit services, lack inexpensive or free parking, and the whole problem of vagabonds in the downtown that simply scare people away. But a decent cafe could really attract some people to James South. Same if there was shopping downtown, like grocery stores, etc. that sell those things that people need on a continual basis, rather than the proliferation of boutiques that though perhaps are nice, does not make for a livable neighbourhood.
    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.


Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.