McCarthy, Clark, Bratina and Pasuta were the only ones opposed to discussing the matter in open council.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Kangaroo Court
McCarthy, Clark, Bratina and Pasuta were the only ones opposed to discussing the matter in open council.
7 comments:
Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.
Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.
Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am watching it live. Amateurs. What are they thinking? I see a lawsuit coming that we will pay for.
ReplyDeleteElivis P.
How can one get access to the email which is widely distributed?
ReplyDeleteThe allegations are so explosive and are based on fact. How can the City Manager and Council and Department Heads deflect this one? The culture of deceit and misrepresentation and fake "restructurings" end up costing taxpayers huge amounts and poisons the environment. Council appears to be asleep at the switch. Hamilton now has its own Watergate!
ReplyDeleteYou can see the complaint here http://www.hamiltoncatch.org/download.php?id=115
ReplyDeleteThere is something very seriously wrong in this city and there seems to be no end in sight.
ReplyDeleteHow can we trust anything anymore?
Mr Khan is a hero in my books, an honest person, that cares. Too bad the slime have tried to block his requests to appear before council.
Does anybody seriously think, that heads will roll over this? or will they hide it, like they hide everything else?
It will be buried, just like the other abuses over the years that were buried. Sure, someone might loose their job, yeah, the path to the life of ease and luxury, with huge payouts and giant severance packages - which is only slightly short of scoring large on Lotto MAX...
ReplyDeleteSomehow they will bury it like they did with the Downtown Renewal department.
ReplyDeleteJust think, this is the thin end of the wedge. I have no doubt that there is plenty of truth behind this.
Unfortunately, I think City Hall will spin doctor the whole thing like they have done in the past with similar acquisations..........downtown renewal. They'll shoot the messanger, I've noticed Larry DiIanni is already running to Harnum's support on his blog and insinuating that Khan is a former disgruntled employee. I take the comments with a grain of salt given his track record.
I admire Mr. Kahn for coming forward. I'm sure he will face some sort of legal action. What he has done has taken extreme courage and perhaps jeopardized his future financially. He seems very principled in his actions though.
I've seen it first hand at City Hall but can't bring myself to risk my future livelihood. I have so much respect for Mr. Kahn.