Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Time Out

The city and the Tiger Cats have agreed to split the costs of hiring a mediator to work out the Pan Am site.

No details have been released as to who the mediator should be, and how much the Cats and the City are prepared to pay.

Mediation can cost upwards of $500-$600 per hour.

See full Spec article here

Are you supportive of this measure? Should the city pick up half the costs of mediation?

6 comments:

  1. Tom RobertsonMay 12, 2010

    The City had already made up it's mind. If Bob Young wants to try to change it he should be picking up the full costs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Elvis P.May 12, 2010

    Come on. Young can pay for it. Why does the everday man get cha chinged all the time?

    Elvis P. out

    ReplyDelete
  3. I will fondly remember the two days in May 2010 when the city appeared to have finally found the ability to tell those with narrow self-interest and regressive opinions that their input was no longer required.

    Maybe we can have a civic holiday every May 6th to remember the glorious event, or perhaps a moment of silence on May 8th would be more appropriate?

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousMay 13, 2010

    I don't think a mediator will do anything since Eisenberger has already made up his mind. He is not willing to compromise or do what is right for the city only what is right for himself and his hidden agenda. He has already blatantly lied on several occasions including the May 17th deadline threat and also concerning the progress being made at the west harbour site.. The best thing would be to have both sides present their case to the people of Hamilton and let them vote on it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousMay 13, 2010

    Why doesn't Mr. Young just say EXACTLY where he wants the stadium located and EXACTLY how much he will contribute if it is built there.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "He is not willing to compromise or do what is right for the city only what is right for himself and his hidden agenda." - Anon

    The mayor is the one with the hidden agenda???

    In an email response from Scott Mitchell, a friend of mine was told "He didn't understand the issues". But the Ti-Cats have supposedly made those issues very well known through the media... I thought they were, access, parking and "visibility"??? But Mr. Mitchell claims a citizen of Hamilton well versed on the topic "Doesn't understand the issues".

    So who is the one with the "hidden agenda"?

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.


Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.