Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Mohawk College Replies to Questions re: Sale of 196 Wentworth North.

Further to our coverage of the sale of 196 Wentworth Street North from Mohawk College, to Mission Services, we asked Mohawk to answer a few questions. Special thanks to Jay Robb, Director of Communications for Mohawk College, for responding on behalf of Mohawk. (as an aside, we are also expecting a reply from Barry Coe of Mission Services, for questions we have put to him)

1. The sale of 196 Wentworth St. North to Mission Services has been the subject of controversy. Can you explain the nature of this transaction, why Mohawk elected it to sell it at this time, and how it came to be that Mission Services was the recipient of the sale.

Back in 2009, Mohawk moved the last of our continuing education programs out of the Wentworth Campus and the building was declared surplus. Mission Services then approached Mohawk with an unsolicited offer to buy the property. Following negotiations with Mission Services and a consultation with the City of Hamilton, an agreement of purchase and sale was finalized this past October on mutually acceptable terms. Mission Services now owns the property.

2: The Bristol Street Neighbourhood Residents, in a press release to The Hamiltonian and other media

sources, describe this sale as an "unconscionable decision which has led to much anxiety" and it was further described by them as “irresponsible corporate behavior". How do you respond to those assertions and do you understand their concerns and protests?

Mission Services is a long-standing and well-respected community partner, with standout employment and training programs that help people achieve and contribute to their fullest potential. Mohawk makes no apologies for selling the property to Mission Services. Our understanding is that Mission Services fully intends to comply in every respect with the zoning requirements that govern this property. Any concerns that the permitted land uses are somehow inappropriate should be directed to the City of Hamilton.

3: The Bristol Street Neighbourhood Residents are requesting/demanding that the remaining surplus property owned by Mohawk College on Bristol street - is "not to be disposed unilaterally by Mohawk College without full consultation with the residents and property owners of this neighbourhood".
Can you provide any information of what will become of this land being referred to?

Mohawk currently has no firm plans for the disposition of the college’s remaining property on Bristol Street.

4. It appears as though the community has had a very strong reaction to what they see as the adverse affects that the sale to Mission Services will have. While in that context it may not be possible to find a middle ground, is there something Mohawk can do to respond to the concerns of the community and offer up some sort of concession or, at the very least, a dialogue?

While changes within a neighbourhood can cause initial apprenhension, Mohawk is confident that the former Wentworth Campus under the ownership of Mission Services will contribute in a positive and substantive way to enhancing the quality life within the Bristol Street Neighbourhood and throughout all of Greater Hamilton. For our part, Mohawk will continue to focus on providing first-class post-secondary skills training and education to all Hamiltonians.


Thanks to Jay and Mohawk for engaging on The Hamiltonian.

17 comments:

  1. Fascinating.

    'Can open, worms all over.'

    Never mind the actual uses this facility may or may not end up being home to, putting aside the decided lack of information about what's going on there, here's a pivotal issue: the easement. As I understand it, the access is owned by Cathy Weaver Elementary School. Under the 'worst' of circumstances (and this goes back to the yet-fully-responded-to 'Good Neighbour Contract' that was presented to Mission Services), does it seem reasonable to have such a facility right smack-dab against a school of this nature? With nothing separating the two?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, they avoided some of the questions but really, why should they apologize? They sold a property- big deal. The real deal is not this sale, but the intensification of crack dealers, and other unshady characters in the ward. All being left to get "treatmemt".

    Mr. Sarc

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't blame the residents in this comminuty for being angry. Would you want a mission services plopped onto your street? I think not. I would like to know where was the Councillor during these negotiations? Why isn't he advocating for the residents? What is his position on all of this?

    Blair

    ReplyDelete
  4. Blair,

    We have asked... he refers us to Pastor Ed and Barry Coe. He doesn't say a whole lot.

    I don't see how having this facility is going to help the 'greater Hamilton area' All I see is it affecting the property values of the neighbourhood in a negative way, as if they weren't bad enough already.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In keeping with the spirit of positive discussion and positive resolution we promise not too shoot the messenger. Mohawk has good intentions, but lets look at the whole picture,
    where we must ask many questions?
    One that comes too mind is: Historically, has putting all the social services and support programs in one concentrated area, proven truly beneficial to the people that need it and keeping in mind those who don't?

    Other than transportation issues(economical accessibility( which would be resolved by wise city investment into transportation so dispersement of services and getting to them isn't a burden), I dont beleive this too be the right direction to go.
    There are far more educated people in this city than myself who can answer that question. I am open to solutions.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the interview Hamiltonian. I don't know why Mohawk is dragged into this. The condition of Ward 3 was not created by Mohawk College. Pretty silly and shallow for people to be blaming them. Good to have all sides of the story here.
    Sorce

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good questions. I don't buy their answers but at least we are hearing from them now.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, I forgot t say...

    Morelli thinks it's a great idea. Yup, if it's not a slum now, it soon will be!

    Funny thing is... parents at the school were totally unaware of the plan until now. Cathy Wever School didn't think it was necessary I guess. As long as the 'Wever Hub' thinks it's a good idea, hey, who else needs to know. I guess they represent everyone in the neighbourhood, funny never heard of them or what they do until now. So no, you don't represent me!

    ReplyDelete
  9. "I don't know why Mohawk is dragged into this."

    No, clearly you don't. And it's also abundantly clear that you either don't know or understand the full story.

    It's sad to say that what's unfolding here is indicative of what's capable of happening in Hamilton in almost every ward. When there's a lacking of openness and transparency, when communities aren't communicated with, when people don't have a strong and effective voice to be asking questions, demanding meaningful responses and full answers.

    I'm saying this as a result of what I've been exposed to on a grassroots level over the past six weeks or so, from various directions, on various fronts.

    I commend The Hamiltonian for branching out and taking on the issues that seemingly aren't going to be covered by others. But honestly? We haven't even begun to see what's going to happen here.

    It's going to get messy.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @YourStoney Creek

    The core of what I said is that Mohawk is not responsible for the condition the ward has become. That took years and years. So what part don't I understand? Are you suggesting otherwise?
    Sorce

    ReplyDelete
  11. MyStoneyCreek makes a valid point. Communities are not being listened to and things like this just run them over. But the question is how to solve that.

    I like Sorce's idea (on another thread), about having term limits as a one time fix. We have to get new people in who actually will work with communities. As much as I thought the new faces were a good addition, I think they are getting very comfortable with the status quo.

    On this Bristol street matter, I feel badly for the community and I hope the changes turn out to be not as bad as they think they will be.

    Severn

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes, I am very disappointed that noone else is giving this the time of day. The Spec is running stories that are nowhere near as important. I know The Hamiltonian is not as huge as The Spec, so I know you folks are trying. But we need more media involvement. Media that is not afraid to showcase stories like this and ask the questions. Thanks for getting Mohawk and MS to peek their heads out at least.

    Brana - Ward 3

    ReplyDelete
  13. "he Spec is running stories that are nowhere near as important"

    Today's front page has "Lack of Halloween candy sours neighbours"

    Really?

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Just Sayin, you forgot to add one thing.

    "Lack of Halloween candy sours neighbours", in Oshawa.....

    As The Spec continues to lose importance to me and my life I'm considering on going daily newspaperless.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The Spectator and The Hamiltonian should merge imho

    ReplyDelete
  16. One question: I wonder where those involved in the decision to sell live? It's pretty easy to not care when you live far away from it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hamiltonian AdminNovember 09, 2011

    Sorce: we would kindly ask that you refer to users by their proper handles. Thank-you

    Hamiltonian Admin

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.


Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.