Two local groups, Environment Hamilton and Hamiltonians for Progressive Development secured a promise from Walmart to build a sidewalk up to the bridge, and contribute $50,000.00 per year for four years, for transit service.
But a staff report estimates that the service will cost five times that amount per year, while only being expected to bring in a return of $50,000.00 a year from fare revenues. That equation results in $150,000 per year that the city must subsidize, even after considering the Walmart yearly contribution.
Your views?
The full story, as reported by the good people at C.A.T.C.H., is pasted below.
Taxpayers are being asked to subsidize a new bus service to get customers and staff to a controversial new Walmart on Centennial Parkway that replaces one at Eastgate Square. A railway embankment and bridge – now confirmed to not require replacement – blocks pedestrian access to the big box store adjacent to the QEW.
The location of the supersized store on lands previously zoned for industrial uses was controversial. Provincial planning officials advised the city against approving the rezoning, and two community groups appealed the decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.
However, the province did not join the appeal, leading the groups – Environment Hamilton and Hamiltonians for Progressive Development – to agree to a pre-hearing settlement that extracted a promise from Walmart to build a sidewalk up to the bridge, and contribute $50,000 a year for four years to transit service.
A staff report going to councillors tomorrow says that service will cost five times that amount and likely only generate fare revenues of $50,000 a year. So even with the Walmart contribution, the city will need to find at least $150,000 a year.
At present, HSR runs a summer-only weekend and holiday service along Centennial to Confederation Park, 700 metres north of the new Walmart store. The proposal going to the general issues committee tomorrow calls for a pilot program that would make that year round starting in late March, but subject to a review after the first year of operation.
“Increasing the service days of this route, while maintaining the present 45-minute service frequency, combined with a minor re-routing at the shopping centre parking lot will result in a daily transit service that coincides with the busiest portion of Walmart store hours, 1030 am until 630 pm,” says the staff report. This route enhancement will also provide Confederation Park visitors with year round access to the various attractions situated within the park.”
Objections from the citizen groups and others to permitting the new store pointed to the lack of transit service and the narrow railway underpass that makes pedestrian access extremely dangerous. There was also concern that the closure of the Eastgate Walmart could threaten that mall’s viability and impose hardships on the large numbers of low-income residents without vehicles who currently rely on the fac ility.
The new outlet is more than a kilometre north of the apartment towers housing many of those residents, and 900 metres away from the nearest bus stop on Barton Street. Wage levels at big box outlets mean many of their employees can’t afford to operate a vehicle.
It appeared that the railway bridge might require imminent replacement, and thus an opportunity to install sidewalks, but CN railway officials recently poured cold water on that view. In a letter to council earlier this month, CN responded to city concerns “about the functionality and life span” of the bridge.
“Under current loading applied to the bridge and at current train operation speed, the Centennial Parkway bridge is structurally sound for the foreseeable future,” wrote CN’s bridges and structures engineer. “CN has no plans to replace the bridge.”
More than a year ago, however, city council endorsed a staff recommendation to spend $11 million to replace the bridge in response to an inspection that concluded “the existing bridge structure has become structurally deficient and is in need of replacement to ensure public safety and continuity of the road network.”
The issue hit the media in early November with the revelation that the city – not CN – is financially responsible for the railway bridge over Centennial, something that the local councillor, Chad Collins, described as a surprise. However, he said replacement would help traffic flow and increase pedestrian access and development opportunitie s, and in response to the recent CN letter Collins is maintaining his support for reconstruction.
Collins also authored the December walk-on resolution asking staff “to address the introduction of transit services to the new regional shopping complex on Centennial Parkway”.
Was this anticipated? Thought out? Why should we be subsidizing this?
ReplyDeleteSounds like somebody didn't do their homework....AGAIN!!!!
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with Gordon...and I will wage that the amount we will end up subsidizing will be more than the figures within this report...
ReplyDeleteWe talk about intensification on one hand and making our community walkable and then do this...
Money and the big boxes talk...
Seems that we keep forgeting about the average or below living wage citizens and the small Ma and Pa Stores that are just trying to survive!!!
Let's start by taking the money from the councillor's salaries that approved YET ANOTHER Wal-Mart. Drove down Centenial Parkway today and passed the new wal-mart. What a freakin nightmare. Dumb, dumb, dumb is all I can say. Now they want buses to try to get in and out of there. Good Luck.
ReplyDeleteI hate Wal-Marts for the simple reason that they are NOT Canadian and they put small businesses out of business. Get ready for the next one folks, just a blink down the road at Fifty Road in Winona. The once lovely quiet community is in for a rude awakening. Oh - does that mean that Winona will finally get bus service???
My other concern is that these mega Wal-Mart "Smart" Centre's are now positioned along the QEW, which means, you got it - MORE FREAKIN traffic.
This council is ruining the east end all the way to Winona.
Robert
I don't see anything that says that Walmart asked for this service.
ReplyDeleteIt only says that Environment Hamilton And Hamiltonians for Progressive Developement secured funding from Walmart to subsidize HSR service to the area. Perhaps those two groups should have asked the HSR if they were going to provide service before getting a contribution from Walmart.
The city is not obligated to provide transit to this private developement, so why should they. Maybe the people at Environment Hamilton and Hamiltonians for Progressive Developement shouldn't assume things in the future and try to make decisions for the HSR and the democratically elected council.
What was wrong with where the Warmart was? People that don't drive could actually get there! This move has just made it worse for everyone.
ReplyDelete"What was wrong with where the Warmart was? People that don't drive could actually get there! This move has just made it worse for everyone."
ReplyDeleteUm... Clearly it wasn't big enough for WalMart for them to make the kind of $$$ they aspired to. They needed to 'supersize' it for maximum effect.
is the wallmart that is still not as is as far as pedistrian traffic to local demographic walking proximatey?
ReplyDeleteIs it true the EH and HPD withdrew their OMB appeal of this project after donations to their cause from Wallmart or the site developer?
Is it ture that the development of this site remediated substantial enviromental issues caused be the former occupant of the site?
If it is true they negotiated a deal with an upset limit per year for costs re sidewalks and transit, should they not be held responsible for any overuns, hey they also from what heard recd funds to their cause to drop their appeal.
Anyone care to share the facts?
It's ironic that Hamiltonians are subsidizing bus service to a store that has played such a prolific role in exporting manufacturing jobs and driving down wages for working people.
ReplyDeleteThere are way too many anonymous posters here to keep track of.
ReplyDeleteTo Anonymous - posted Jan 30@7:05,
You are way off base and the "facts" you state have no substance and for that matter - no truth. Learn for yourself becasue the truth is available to you any time you have the desire to go LOOK. The OMB settlement and details of the settlement are part of the public record and available on-line. Why don't you go look and then come back and tell everyone what you find before you spread fertilizer.