 |
| Integrity Commissioner Earl Basse |
Thanks to Mr. Basse for the clarification.
Monday, June 11, 2012
Bratina's Reprimand Clarified
Thanks to Mr. Basse for the clarification.
4 comments:
Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.
Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.
Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No obligatory training ordered on human sensitivity? Management training? Communication skills?
ReplyDelete"No obligatory training ordered on human sensitivity? Management training? Communication skills?"
ReplyDeleteWho did the hiring on this employee, anyway? Can we get them in here for a little talk? See if the employee's performance matches up with the (presumably) extensive screening process that was undertaken...?
My StoneyCreek. I am curious. Who would you have voted for last election for Mayor or who would you have wanted to run?
ReplyDeleteSevern
I did vote in the last election. I voted a 'spoiler/protest' vote, though the candidate would not take my advice on how he could have tremendously impacted the election, the general arena, how he could have raised up up the level of debate, actually got people thinking. This failure on my part actually saddened me more than the eventual result. (Laughing while shaking my head.)
ReplyDeleteWho would I have wanted to have run? Hmm... I never opine about stuff I don't feel qualified to, so I'll be honest and say "I really don't know."
I'm not sure who was available at the time I would have wanted to have run...but I do know that we aren't doing the process any favours (or showing it much respect) when we have almost a dozen-and-a-half candidates running (I just had a Freudian slip and typed 'funning'!) for mayor, and twenty in Ward 2 (where the 'winner' captured less than 21% of the ballots cast.) We need to honour the process a lot more by having 'run-offs' or 'primaries'. And consider something other than 'first-past-the-post' as our model for deciding a victor.