Monday, July 2, 2012

Merulla Fails to Respond to HWT Questions

Clr. Merulla
We asked the following question of Clr. Sam Merulla. The following emails represent his response. Note: The Hamiltonian's emails are in blue font, while the Clr's are in black font. 



From: The Hamiltonian Administrator [mailto:admin@thehamiltonian.info]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 08:29 PM
To: Merulla, Sam
Subject: Following Up


Hi Clr.  Merulla;
Just following up to ask if you will be answering the questions we posed to you regarding the Waterfront Trust. 
Thank you Clr. Merulla


Diane for
The Hamiltonian
Teresa DiFalco, Publisher
www.thehamiltonian.net

The contents of this email are private, confidential, and intended only for the recipient(s) named above.  This email may not be copied or reproduced, forwarded, published or distributed in any manner whatsoever by any person(s) or entity without the expressed written permission of the sender.  If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender and destroy the original email.  Thank you.


To: admin
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 8:36 PM

I've informed you that I would more than willing to champion your cause as a delegation at GIC thereby ensuring I represent my constituents openly and transparently. Please forward me a request so to appear as a delegation so I can formally get to the bottom of your questions.

To: admin
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 8:39 PM

Btw I'm responding to your question at 8:30 pm on a Friday from the Ti Cat game with my wife. This is for publication

To: admin
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 8:44 PM

Btw Thank You for the Follow up.

Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 8:51 PM
To: Merulla, Sam
Subject: Re: Following Up
Clr.

First- apologies for troubling you while at the game. I hope you are enjoying it. Lovely night for a football game.

The question is: Are you surprised by the $474,000.00 loss registered by the Hamilton Waterfront Trust (HWT) for the year 2011, particularly in light of the HWT promising a surplus as late as November 2011?

We have already talked about the delegation thing and in our view , it is not appropriate for us. It may be for one of our readers, if they so choose. . We are really trying to get direct answers to direct questions. Respectfully, it seems that when we ask question A, we get answer C and sometime no answer at all. Hamiltonians are seeing through that.

The follow up is : Are you surprised by the $474,000.00 loss registered by the Hamilton Waterfront Trust (HWT) for the year 2011, particularly in light of the HWT promising a surplus as late as November 2011? You don't have to answer it now. Family time is important.

All respectfully submitted. 

From: Merulla, Sam
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 8:58 PM 
To: admin@thehamiltonian.info
Subject: Re: Following Up

I can only serve the hard working people of Hamilton from Council and or Committee. Therefore I urge you to be a public delegation and to attend a meeting or send a delegation so I can serve the thousands of residents in Ward 4 that do not have access to a computer.

Thank You,
Councillor Sam Merulla,  

From: Merulla, Sam
To: admin@thehamiltonian.info
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 8:58 PM

I'm sorry your lack of response from my expected time of response is concerning to me and Hamiltonians. Please respond ASAP so I can openly, transparently and conscientiously serve Hamiltonians.

From: "The Hamiltonian Administrator" <admin@thehamiltonian.info>
Date:  Jun 29, 2012   9:09 PM
To: Merulla, Sam<Sam.Merulla@hamilton.ca>
Reply-To: admin@thehamiltonian.info
Subject: Re: Following Up

Respectfully- we will not engage in game playing. It is an inappropriate request. Do you ask the spec to form a delegation each time they have a question. 

To: admin
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 9:13 PM

I'm waiting for request to appear at committee so all Hamiltonians regardless of computer ownership can participate.

To: admin
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 9:04 PM

I just asked 10 Ward 4 residents whether they knew about" The Hamiltonian". The answer 0 of 10. Therefore help me help you to be a true representative of Hamiltonians. Call me. We need to talk

To: admin
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 9:15 PM

The Spec has national press credentials. Please forward your media credentials to me and I will consult with my residents.

From: Merulla, Sam
To: admin@thehamiltonian.info
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 9:17 PM

Btw this is all for publication. Happy Canada Day my friends.

From: The Hamiltonian Administrator [mailto:admin@thehamiltonian.info]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 09:23 PM
To: Merulla, Sam
Subject: Re: Following Up

If you rethink this and would like to answer the question, let us know.

Thank you

To: admin
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 9:25 PM

I've included the national media as well as local. Hence if you rethink your position please let me know!

God Bless

From: Merulla, Sam
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 9:28 PM
To: admin@thehamiltonian.info ; DL - News Media ; DL - SMT & ACs ; DL -
Council & Support Staff
Subject: Re: Following Up

Fyi

To: admin
Subject: Re: Following Up
Sent: Jun 29, 2012 9:25 PM

I've included the national media as well as local. Hence if you rethink your
position please let me know!

God Bless

From: Merulla, Sam

From: admin@thehamiltonian.info
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 9:47 PM
To: Merulla, Sam ; DL - News Media ; DL - SMT & ACs ; DL - Council & Support 
Staff
Subject: Re: Following Up

Clr. We note that you did not include our responses in which we acknowledged
that you were at the game with your spouse and that family time was
important. We also suggested to you that you may want to reply at another
time.

We asked you a simple question: Are you surprised by the $474,000.00 loss
registered by the Hamilton Waterfront Trust (HWT) for the year 2011,
particularly in light of the HWT promising a surplus as late as November
2011?

Your suggestion that we should form a delegation in order to ask this
question,. is inappropriate- and we have expressed that to you. You have
been a frequent guest on The Hamiltonian and have provided prompt answers to
questions we posed, and we are appreciative of that. Your new position of
having to form a delegation is not only inappropriate, it seems to be a new
policy as a reaction to a simple question surrounding the Hamilton
Waterfront Trust. Notwithstanding the inappropriateness of your request, you
have not asked us to do so on any other question we have asked of you.

If you do not want to answer the question , we respect that. But to attempt
to pit us against others cheapens the discussion.


Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 10:02 PM
To: 'admin@thehamiltonian.info' <admin@thehamiltonian.info>; DL - News Media; DL - SMT & ACs; DL - Council & Support Staff
Subject: Re: Following Up

The Country is waiting on the Hamiltonian! What's it going to be folks!


Thank You,
Councillor Sam Merulla,

From: Merulla, Sam
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 10:14 PM
To: 'admin@thehamiltonian.info' <admin@thehamiltonian.info>; DL - News Media; DL - SMT & ACs; DL - Council & Support Staff
Subject: Re: Following Up

Let me tell you what it is going to be! Stop breaking our balls until you have media credentials to request what you are requesting. Until then please feel free to ask council for permission to be a delegation to present your case so we can conscientiously serve our constituents globally.

Fyi. This is for Publication!
Thank You,
Councillor Sam Merulla

From: Merulla, Sam
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 11:30 PM
To: admin@thehamiltonian.info ; DL - News Media ; DL - SMT & ACs ; DL -
Council & Support Staff
Subject: Re: Following Up

I look forward to your delegation at GIC considering you do not have media
credentials. Having said this I strongly encourage you to come forward as a
delegation so council can champion the defeat of your real and or imagined
demons thereby ensuring I and all of council are conscientiously serving
our constituency.

This is for publication purposes.


Thank You,
Councillor Sam Merulla,


* Please note- the other question we asked Clr. Merulla (which is why we are referring to questions in the plural), is this one, that was sent to him on June 16, 2012 

 Clr. Merulla:

We are wondering if you could answer the following for publication purposes on The Hamiltonian.

Q. In light of a recent article in The Bay Observer (http://bayobserver.ca/2012/06/15/waterfront-trust-bookkeeping-raises-eyebrows/ ) , where some disturbing assertions are being made on the manner in which the Hamilton Waterfront Trust is being run financially and otherwise, and notwithstanding any comments you may have made about the Trust in the past, would you entertain bringing a motion to council asking for a forensic audit of the Trust? If not, are there any other remedies you would consider to address the concerns raised in the article. And if you are not of the view that such an intervention is necessary, can you expand on why you believe that?
Thank-you Clr


Your thoughts are welcome. Note: As per our moderation policy, only respectful comments will be published. This does not mean your comment cannot be spirited or critical- but it must be respectful.

65 comments:

  1. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    Is that the kind of abusive treatment that is dished out for asking a question? I think there is a code of conduct violation. And I guess Clr. Merulla did not read the part of the first email that said:

    The contents of this email are private, confidential, and intended only for the recipient(s) named above. This email may not be copied or reproduced, forwarded, published or distributed in any manner whatsoever by any person(s) or entity without the expressed written permission of the sender. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender and destroy the original email. Thank you.

    Ism't that a violation of trust/professionalism?

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    Oh my God!!! He really didn't say these things, did he?

    There must be something about this story that is scaring these clrs.

    It is time to go the people. A Forensic Audit and possibly an investigation on this coverup is needed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    I'm absolutely speechless!

    FYI. This is for publication

    ReplyDelete
  4. DisgustedJune 30, 2012

    As a citizen of Hamilton Teresa, allow mw to be the first to apologize on behalf of Sam Merulla. I find his behaviour deplorable and you and definitively do not deserve this. This is abusive! You asked a question.

    I am also suggesting that the Clr. step down and also apologize himself.

    Disgusted

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    Theresa, I am appalled by merulla's response, although not surprised. Me thinks he doth protest too much!

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    This is being soooo hyprocritical. Merulla has here and other sites, more than any other counselor. Suddenly he has a change of heart. Why? HWT perhaps? I think he should apologize at the very least. It's an embarassment the way he carried on. But he likley made a fool of himself to the national media- who likely doesn't care anyway. I have yet to read anything where an accusation was made against the HWT on this site. Accusations were made by the Bay Observer but as far as I can see, questions are being asked here. Why all the rage from Merulla? Is he well?

    ReplyDelete

  7. What is wrong with Merulla? How dare he use that lanuage with a woman, or with anybody for that matter. Email after email, which became more and more taunting, condsending and down right abusive. This is harrassment. Shame on Councillor Merulla. Perhaps some anger management training is in order. I would report this behaviour. You and your staff run an excellent media source and and I simply lost for words for what Sam Merulla.

    Donna

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. I agree Donna. Anger management therapy is needed. He sent 13 emails? That's harassment. And his language. Offensive to women. I hope he is not counting on the female vote. I'll make up a few signs just before the next election . Maybe I'll start at the gym.

      Theresa. Bless you for putting up with such poor manners.

      Delete

  8. Sam Merulla is obviously trying to cover something up. I read the question 2x, along with The Hamiltonian emails to Sam. The question is in typical Hamiltonian form - respectful and to the point. I found nothing in The Hamiltonians emails to make Sam fly off the handle like he did. He was out of control and on a rampage of attack. He only made it worse for himself when he copied everyone and their brother on his crazy emails. Makes you wonder what he was doing at the football game!

    As a woman, I am very insulted and offended by his crude reference to a males private area.

    Councillor Merulla - you owe Teresa and her staff a huge public aplogy.

    MKL

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    Does anyone know how many times he has responded to TH and where I can get a copy of his responses? It seems that he had no problem then but now for some reason his "balls are being busted".

    When Basse is being talked to I'm sure he will be interested in this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Cant count that high. But here's my favorite quote from Sam on TH

      "I treat all inquiries equally and I encourage more citizens to be engaged in the political process. Blogs are more relevant today than ever before and I believe they are here to stay and I welcome them regardless of what some people might be suggesting."

      That was before the HWT questions.

      Delete
  10. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    You just swung at a curve ball Hamiltonian. Merulla is brilliant and clever. He has just changed the focus and attention away from his buddies on HWT!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

      I respectfully disagree. This is another reason to go to the IC. This, plus the story of the HWT is now on Raise the Hammer. The rest of the public will probably hear about this next week.

      The other clrs are terrified!

      Delete
  11. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    Don't take the bait people. Get refocused on keep your eye on the ball. Don't let Merulla out smart you. He's good but let's not make him great. Let's talk about the Trust and someone should take Merulla up on his offer to attend as a delegation. It might work?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

      Clever? Brilliant? The only thing Sam has done is prove that The Bay Observer is on to something. By carrying on against The Hamiltonian, he is also showing that he finds the line of questioning threatening. So, what has he accomplished? He has confirmed that where there's smoke there's fire.

      Here's my guess. The Hamiltonian has some very intelligent people. Smarter than the average bear and average Merulla. I think TH has a few sources and knows a few things. Just my guess...They are asking the right questions and that has council nervous.

      To The Hamiltonian. Keep doing what you do and don't change a single thing about it. You add a lot of value to Hamilton.

      Merulla should apologize and resign. Not necessarily in that order. Not necessarily in that order.

      I suspect they still sell beer at Ivor Wynne.

      Delete
  12. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    "Let me tell you what it is going to be! Stop breaking our balls until you have media credentials to request what you are requesting." ?????????????????????????

    And he got upset because the Mayor was not speaking on behalf of council. And Merulla, from his seat at a football game can declare "how it's gonna be"? Hilarious and delusional. Can he be censured? That would be sweet justice.

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousJune 30, 2012

    Yopu chose the perfect Title "merulla fails to respond to questions re HWT". Cause that's what this is about. Coiuncillors who will not answer questions about the HWT. Its not abaout Sam's make-believe drama.

    ReplyDelete

  14. Sam,

    I have been following the unfolding HWT drama ever since the first question about its affairs was raised publicly by Mayor Bratina, for which he was vilified by you and your colleagues including your so called credentialed media.

    Since then, you and some of your fellow councillors have publicly demeaned and slandered the mayor on several occasions. Your collective unprofessional behavior has been consistently amplified by the local press who instead of questioning HWT, joined in the 'let's bash the mayor' frenzy and turned it into a public circus.

    Your collective misguided actions in my opinion not only brought disrepute to yourselves and your careers, but it hurt the image of our city.

    More recently, explicit questions were raised in the --new media-- regarding the affairs of HWT, which are obviously counter to the warm and fuzzy endorsements some of your councillors friends have publicly chosen to give HWT.

    When the Hamiltonian.net respectfully started asking questions to your colleagues on council and the board members of HWT, all they got was stonewalling, absurd replies and blatant non-replies to various questions. Their behavior is a matter of public record.

    Chad Collins refused to reply like a responsible adult to the questions, Tom Jackson chose to reply in a very arrogant, patronizing and disrespectful manner.

    Councillor Jason Farr was the only one who made an earnest attempt to reply with dignity and the seriousness that this issue demands. Being new to the council and the HWT board, to his credit, he rightfully chose to have a staff respond to the question/s.

    Meanwhile, your above response to what are clearly -respectfully asked questions- has left all here, including me aghast!!

    I presume your wife and daughter are also reading your diatribe, as are countless wife, daughters, husbands and sons in many families across the city and region; including our city staff, councillors and their spouses and children too.

    Such is the pervasiveness of the new media.

    What do you really expect all of these readers to make of your response?

    What do you think countless teachers will be telling their students on Tuesday in many classrooms across our city who closely follow --new media-- publications such this one to learn about local affairs?

    It is very apparent that Chad Collins, Tom Jackson, the HWT chair and Executive Director have clearly failed in their legally mandated councillor duties to respond directly in an appropriate and timely manner to the questions raised by citizens.

    If they choose to not respond in a mature manner, it is to the detriment of their personal reputation and political careers.

    But what is shocking and scandalous is your response above.

    Why all this defensiveness, anger and bullying? Do you have anything to fear or hide? Or are you merely taking on the role of the "protector" for those who have been publicly questioned and who clearly failed to respond in a professional manner?

    As an adult, you could have chosen to simply not reply, considering where you were, or you could have simply forwarded the questions to the city staff for an appropriate response.

    Instead, not only did you not reply to the question, you dodged it, and in a pathetic attempt to deflect the question, you chose to mock and humiliate the individuals who questioned you.

    Do you really expect this situation to go away now?

    Contd...

    Part 1 of 2

    ReplyDelete

  15. Part 2 of 2

    If anything your arrogant and belligerent behavior has just made it worse for Chad Collins, Tom Jackson and the Board of HWT.

    Let alone the public outcry, come Tuesday morning - which your credentialed media will have to pick up eventually, I am afraid, you will now have to deal with the wrath of your own councillor friends whom now you appear to be protecting.

    You are behaving here like an high-school bully. And this is simply not acceptable.

    My suggestion to you is that you promptly offer an unconditional public apology to thehamiltonian.net and its readers for your deplorable public conduct.

    And then, if you wish to do the right thing, write an appropriate and respectful response to the questions asked of you.

    But somehow I get the feeling that you will not apologize, given you demeanor and sense of entitlement. So come Tuesday morning, do not be surprised if --printed copies-- of your diatribe above, along with the absurd replies of Collins, Jackson and the HWT chair & executive director, find their way into thousands of mailboxes on the front porches of homes and countless seniors facilities in all wards across the city.

    Sam this is the real raw power of the new media which has no centralized command, no questions to dodge... and no games to play.

    You will have brought this onto yourself if you fail to apologize and make amends soon. Extreme arrogance as you may be aware, does precede fall.


    Respectfully,
    Mahesh P. Butani

    ReplyDelete

  16. Since when do taxpayers have to form a delegation to ask a question? Does this mean that everytime I have a question for my councillor, I have to attend a council meeting as a delegation? How crazy is that!

    I read The Hamiltonian because it's a respectful exchange of valuable information and I find the questions and answers to be insighful and helpful.

    Merulla's behaviour is appauling. He is so disrespectful to the women of Hamilton for his rude and disgusting comments. He is a bully and should be ashamed of himself.

    The story of the HWF needs to be told. They are definately trying to hide something. As for Merulla, he needs to be reprimanded. He can't get away with what he did.

    Rita S.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Gary SantucciJuly 01, 2012

    We truly have hit a new low with Councillor Merulla's remarks.

    ReplyDelete

  18. WOW! This was an interesting read after returning home from the USA.

    After reading the comments, there are 2 serious issues here:

    1. Getting to the bottom of the WFT. There is definately something here. Something that Sam and his collegues are trying to hide from the taxpayers.

    2. Sam's unprofessional and unethical behaviour. Who does he think he is? This needs to be addressed.

    My advise to The Hamiltonian to all taxpayers of this city, press hard to get to the bottom of the WFT issue, and urge an investigation into the ruthless behaviour that Councillor Merulla displayed towards the good folks of The Hamiltonian.

    I'm very disappointed in Sam. I thought he was a fighter for the taxpayers and that he respected women. My opion has changed and I'm sure many more people will see Sam in a different light now too.

    Does anybody know if he has at least apologized?

    Mary

    ReplyDelete

  19. Here I am sitting on a deck overlooking a lake, and my BS meter sounds off on my IPAD. And sure enough, Merulla's arrogant comments set it off.

    I don't know what he thinks he achieved, but here is what he has achieved:

    He has proved hypocritical- a champion of social media on one hand, and a bully when they ask inconvenient questions. (didn't he claim a large expense to travel to an out of country conference on the taxpayer's dime, and then claimed it was worthwhile because he learned a lot including the use of social media?)

    He has proven BEYOND DOUBT now, that there is something worth asking about as far as the HWT trust goes.

    He has insulted women with his sexists remarks, and all men who believe in decency.

    He has shown why anonymous blogging should be continued- to avoid the persecution that his bully-like behaviour has.

    He has attacked a community publication that is well respected and has worked to bring good discussion on a hundreds, maybe thousands of topics, as far as I know, without asking for a single penny.

    He has proven he truly does not understand the new media landscape. He needs to clue in that The Spec and CBC for example, regularly link to new media such as TH, RTH etc.It will continue to be a force Sam.

    He has "stepped in it" and brought all of his councillors with him, making him and them look bad.

    I agree with Santucci, Merulla's remarks have hit a low and set off the BS meter big time.

    I thought Mahesh's comments were very well stated. Merulla would be wise to read Butani's comments as many times as needed in order for them to be fully appreciated.

    Mahesh had a wonderful idea. If you know the story of Encarta (Microsoft's attempt at an software encyclopedia,you will know that it finally failed and gave way to wikipedia. Why? Because it could not compete with the power of people who donated their time to build a people driven online encyclopedia. Mahesh's idea is brilliant. People should print off copies of materials on The Hamiltonian with regards to the HWT or any other story and start delivering it to their friends and neighbours. Instant print copy.

    Finally, Sam succeeded in advertising his ignorance on the power and partnerships of social media, to the national media, while advertising The Hamiltonian's presence.

    Good job Sam. At the very least, I think you should decline your paycheque this pay and donate it to a local charity.
    Sorce

    ReplyDelete

  20. Laura Babcock is holding Sammy to the fire on Twitter. Go get em Laura!

    Teresa. T H A N K - Y O U for everything. And, on behalf of women, thanks for not putting up with the crap.

    A mom

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. I know. I'm following this on Twitter. I think everyone that reads these emails will agree that Sam has some explaining to do, and at the very least issue a public apology. I don't know where this guy grew up or how he was raised - you just don't talk to women like that.

      I do hope that the Water Front story continues as I am quite curious as to what is going on here. We deserve to know the answers.

      Carl

      Delete

  21. I don't know what the terms GIC and IC refer to. I looked back through all the comments to try to find out. I annoys me when I am forced to do that especially when I never find out what the term stands for. I wish somebody would have the presence of mind to write out the term in full at least once for readers like me who never get to fully understand what is being said when short form terms are used exclusively. Ron Barlow

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 01, 2012

      GIC- General Issues Committe

      Delete
  22. Gary SantucciJuly 01, 2012

    GIC General Issues Committee, formerly known as COW, Committee of the Whole: All Councillors and the Mayor

    ReplyDelete
  23. Gary SantucciJuly 01, 2012

    Sorry IC = Integrity Commissioner (Don't laugh)

    ReplyDelete
  24. Gary SantucciJuly 01, 2012

    The next General Issues Committee is scheduled for July 9th. Individuals and or groups of individuals may make a request to appear before the GIC to ask the unanswered questions posed here on The Hamiltonian. This next meeting is to get on the list for the following GIC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. I don't understand why someone has to take a day off of work to ask a question and get an answer that can and should be answered when the news people ask them. This is why I read The Spec, The Hamiltonian and Raise The Hammer. Why do taxpayers have to loose money from their jobs to be attacked by councillors that won't answer simple questions??? Have you ever seen a delegation present to council? What a joke! They have more dance moves than Fred Astaire.

      Doug

      Delete

  25. On the Twittersphere, Merulla just said that if TH asked him something he had privy to, he would respond. Thought his issue was media credentials? Serious back-peddling going on.

    Mary

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Well then why all the drama and bullying? His emails were not helpful. They were disprectful, sarcastic, demeaning, and condesending. He could have just said that he didn't have the answers and redirect TH to the another person who did. Councillor Merulla behaved badly and out of conduct for a councillor, and his rant of emails prove it.

      Brad

      Delete
  26. North EnderJuly 01, 2012

    I think Merulla was way out of bounds. I think Mayor Bob Bratina should apologize for Sam Merulla, to The Hamiltonian.

    I also think many counselors should now be very nervous.

    North Ender

    ReplyDelete
  27. AnonymousJuly 01, 2012

    People, I think it's time for a serious discussion on change.

    I'm not talking about the Mayor, we've had 4 Mayors since 2000.

    It looks like certain councillors, with certain staff, have been running the city and doing what they want. Unfortunately, the other councillors are like blind mice following their lead.

    WE NEED 15 NEW COUNCILLORS!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  28. AnonymousJuly 01, 2012

    For all of you who follow and contribute to The Hamiltonian, and respect the manner in which this media source albeit one that is not national press credited) conducts itself; Councilor Merulla has clearly indicated that you don't matter. Same goes for the other members of Council and the WFT who refused to answer straight forward questions.
    Let them eat cake?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 06, 2012

      Councillor Merulla doesn't matter. His childish behaviour is embarrasing for City Hall. Time for Mayor Bratina to fire him. The Hamiltonian is a respectable news source and gives the people of Hamilton a chance to share their views. Even The Spec can't top that.

      Way to go Merulla. You showed your true colors.

      Glen

      Delete

  29. On Developing a 'Appropriate Usage Policy" for City Issued Blackberrys/Smart Phones To Councillors for Conducting Official City Work:

    Was an official city issued phone/smart-phone/blackberry used by Sam in his belligerent email exchange with theHamiltonian.net?

    If so, are such abusive emails by an elected councillor in violation of the city's --appropriate use-- of tax-payer funded, official communication devices which are given to councillors to conduct official business of the city.

    If there is no such use policy in place, then the staff should include this in the "City Media Relations Policy":

    - No councillors shall make use of tax-payer funded communication devices to send single/multiple abusive emails/text messages during or after work hours.

    - The usage/cost of such tax payer funded communication devices by all councillors during day and by evening/night should be made public on a monthly basis.

    Does anyone know whether this city issued communication device is being used by Sam to post family pictures on facebook or make silly or personal comments online, or as now, even back-pedal on this issue on twitter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Randy MooreJuly 02, 2012

      Good point Mahesh. The City Manager and Council should look into this behaviour and abusive use of city property.

      It's obvious from the comments here that Councillor Merulla has offended and ticked off a lot of people. His beligerent email exchange with The Hamiltonian was nothing short than abusive.

      Randy Moore

      Delete

  30. If Mr. Merulla was using a city issued blackberry or device, I would also like to know if he had consumed alcoholic beverages prior to or during the tirade.

    I am embarrassed for him and I think this has really put the light on the need to get answers to The Hamilton Waterfront Trust questions that The Hamiltonian asked.

    Let's start one at a time: Clr. Jackson says that him, Rossini, Farr and Plessel asnered the questions.

    Can anyone show me where they answered this one, for example:

    4. Are members of the Trust provided with company vehicles that are subsidized in any way, in whole or in part, including the cost of gasoline or fuel, through taxpayer dollars? If so, how many vehicles and what is the value of the subsidy?

    Don't be diverted by Merulla's bad behaviour. But I agree that he should apologize and forfeit a paycheck. Mr. Bratina had the class to do that when he threw the pen.

    Severn

    ReplyDelete

  31. Merulla is doing some heavy back-peddeling trying to make it look like he was trying to help.

    He attempted to humiliate The Hamiltonian by taunting them in front of all of council, staff, senior management and the NATIONAL media. How is that helping?

    Stop being so dellusional Merulla. You tried to divert people from the HWT questions and the only thing you did was make yourself look like a ______ and you drew further attention to HWT. Hand over at least 1 weeks pay.

    Mr. Sarc

    ReplyDelete
  32. AnonymousJuly 01, 2012

    It would be a great help if the Hamilton Spectator would ask these questions. However in numerous controversies involving tax money they seem unwilling to dig very deep. Now the citizen-taxpayer is being told that only the credentialled media can ask questions. So the logic is circular and there is no place for the citizen to break into the circle.

    So maybe in deference to Clr. Merulla, any citizen who is uncertain that she/he is getting fair value for their tax money should apply for media credentials. And ask the questions.

    Or better, bring a delegation to a council meeting. And ask the questions.

    ReplyDelete
  33. AnonymousJuly 01, 2012

    Councillor I for one was absolutely shocked of your response. This is similar type of response that got Terry Whitehead in trouble. Do you think this may not happen again. And if so will the city again pick up the tab. Wake up and just answer the question honestly. If you do not know the answer then just say so. I for one was at the game and it was truly awful, but that gives you no right to speak in writing this comment. Careers can be broken by stupid comments and this one is very close.

    ReplyDelete
  34. AnonymousJuly 01, 2012

    When the attack dog is released you really never know what it's going to do and if you can contol it. I think the other councillors have now put the leash back on Merulla. Heel Sam!

    ReplyDelete
  35. AnonymousJuly 01, 2012

    If Merulla used a city paid for blackberry or other device to post personal pictures or for this rampage of his, he violated the code of conduct that says:

    No member of Council shall use or permit the use of City land, facilities equipment, supplies, services, City employees or other resources (for example, City-owned materials, websites, Council transportation delivery services or Councillor global budgets) for activities other than the business of the City.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Term Limits NowJuly 01, 2012

    Thanks for making my point Merulla. We need term limits now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. I am still with ya Term Limits Now!!

      Delete
  37. AnonymousJuly 02, 2012

    The Hamiltonian shows great respect in all questions asked and all responses. I am truly impressed. As an ordinary resident I trust this site more so than the Spectator which fails miserably at serious local issues.

    ReplyDelete
  38. North End West ResidentJuly 02, 2012

    Well. This was a little surprise! I wasn't aware that SM could behave in such an appalling fashion. This certainly makes me view him in a different light (not positive!). TH has done and continues to do a brilliant job in this issue. Hang tough - he disgusting behaviour will catch up with him!

    Come on now, Sam - it's time to answer a very simple question(s). What on earth are you afraid of? Optics are that you have something to hide in this.

    ReplyDelete
  39. AnonymousJuly 03, 2012

    This is a silly argument concerning "credentials" It's like the mp3 craze. People now buy music omline from Itunes etc. Hardly anyomne goes into a CD store any more. The music industry was caught off guard and as a result, many went under.

    Same with media. Credentials? That's yesterday's thinking. get with it.

    ReplyDelete
  40. AnonymousJuly 03, 2012

    Merulla continues to do serious back-peddling on Twitter. He should just apologize and move on. Trying to spin it like he was just trying to help. By copying the national press and trying to humiliate TH? Come on Sam. Don't you know how to apologize?

    ReplyDelete
  41. AnonymousJuly 05, 2012

    C'mon folks, let's not blow this boorish behaviour out of proportion or lose sight of the actual issues by going down the track of whether he used a blackberry issued or funded by the city.

    Also it is clear to me that while the mechanism may be a "blog" TH has clearly become an online magazine that showcases Hamilton, warts and all. Mr. Merulla may be irked that the questions are persistent, but I don't see he has a right to belittle. If he does not want to answer he can say so. In effect that is what Judy Partridge did, and I have the greatest respect for her. (She is my Councillor)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 05, 2012

      I don't know if TH is a magazine or a newspaper or what. I think all the news media, RTH, TH etc. all admit that this is an evolution and noone really knows how it all fits. But, I read TH daily because I think it is an intelligent read.

      Delete
  42. AnonymousJuly 05, 2012

    Sam was very rude to me in an email when I wrote to him about the outcome of the development at Centre Mall. this is his typical style, but it still grates.

    ReplyDelete
  43. AnonymousJuly 05, 2012

    He sounds like he may have a drinking problem with those kind of rude comments. Maybe he should be given a breathalizer before he speaks. Get a life Sam old boy. We know who runs the City and who's backing you up. Grow up and be the Councillor the residents deserve or resign! Or maybe get a physciatric evaluation.

    Al

    ReplyDelete
  44. AnonymousJuly 05, 2012

    Mr. Merulla you must have alot of skeletons in your closet and afraid that you may not be able to hide whatever it is your guilty of anymore. Have some RESPECT, or is that a word that you only know when it pertains to love, honor and respect, if you know what I mean. Be a man, apologize and mean it.

    Stan

    ReplyDelete
  45. AnonymousJuly 05, 2012

    Hamiltonion. You do a good job

    Sabanadica

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. What does sabanadica mean?

      Kelly

      Delete
  46. AnonymousJuly 06, 2012

    How unprofessional and embarrasing for Mr. Merulla.

    Online media is the way of the future. I think the dinosour needs to apologize.

    ReplyDelete

  47. Send a delegation "so I can serve the thousands of residents in Ward 4 that do not have access to a computer."

    I think Murella just insulted thousands of people here in his constituency here..Youch that would be darn near all of them..lol

    ReplyDelete
  48. AnonymousJuly 06, 2012

    Perhaps the Code of Conduct should be reviewed with Merulla, specifically Section 17 which states the following:

    b.All members of Council shall:
    i. treat one another, City employees and members of the public appropriately and without abuse, bullying or intimidation;

    Need I say more?

    ReplyDelete
  49. AnonymousJuly 07, 2012

    Theres an old saying which is "watch out for the unexpected mushroom", its used when your talking about someone who you can't trust and has alterior motives. Fits Councillor Merulla very well. By the way, Sabenadica is an old Italian saying meaning Bless you.

    Mario

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJuly 07, 2012

      thats fine but it is also a sign of deep honour and respect in the scicilian tradition. its not italian. its sicilian. big difference if you know what i mean.

      Sabanadica for the hamiltonian. with respect

      Delete
  50. AnonymousJuly 08, 2012

    Councillor Merulla showed disrespect for The Hamiltonian. I think he is starting to realize that The Hamiltonian has taken a great step in our community. Until recently Hamiltonians could never give their opinion or be rightfully informed. We should be thanking the Hamiltonian staff for allowing us to participate and state our views where Hamilton is concerned. Councillor Merulla was totally out of line. He has lost his creditability. Thank you Hamiltonian for allowing us to comment and to be part of your day.

    ReplyDelete
  51. AnonymousJuly 10, 2012

    No apology yet from Merulla? Not classy at all

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.


Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)