Friday, June 1, 2012

Double Vision - Opinion

Fill my eyes, with that double vision
No disguise for that double vision


That's an excerpt from the Foreigner hit "Double Vision" and it could also be symbolic of the seeming disconnect that has recently been confirmed concerning the vision Hamilton professes to follow, and the interpretation, or lack thereof, of that very vision by our municipal council.


For some who may have missed this piece, The Hamiltonian asked our Perspectives Virtual Panel, and our Mayor and each individual city councillor, for their view on what we can do to accelerate the attainment of our vision to be , amongst other things, The Best Place to Raise a Child. The Virtual Panel stepped up and provided thoughts on what we should start doing, stop doing and continue doing to accelerate our progress. Surprisingly, and disappointingly, only Mayor Bratina, and Clrs. Merulla and McHattie chose to share their views. 


An organization's vision statement identifies a desired end state that the organization aspires to- ordinarily in
consultation with and validated by a broader stakeholder group. It serves as an essential  and important point of reference going forward, to ensure that plans, policies, resources, partnerships, and any other instruments and means available to the organization are aligned and continue to be aligned toward the attainment of the vision. The vision is ordinarily ambitious and assumes short, medium and longer term strides. It also demands a commitment to its achievement over the short, medium and longer term.


It's not just a collection of words. Words that make up a vision statement, are meaningful and as such, lend themselves to,  and require further definition. That further definition, promotes consensus and understanding as to what the vision really means and what it entails. With that, targets (metrics and other measurement modalities)  can be attached to each component of the vision. Those targets,  ordinarily negotiated in the course of good governance between the directing minds of the organization (in this case, City Council), and the bureaucracy, as led by the City Manager, form the impetus for strategies and tactics to be developed,  designed and aligned to target achievement. Targets are ordinarily seated in increments of time, and progress toward those targets is routinely measured and reviewed.  


Public reporting should be a natural component as well.  The focus is on continuous learning, continuous improvement,  in course adjustments to strategies, lessons learned and re-calibration/optimization of approaches in order to optimize achievement of targets.  


The cycle continues and refinements are made based on evidence and regression analysis.  Decomposing the vision statement into components and further embedding targets into aspects of performance management plans/contracts that cascade from the City Manager through to the front line staffers, results in traceability of efforts to achieve the vision, from efforts on the ground and throughout the hierarchy. Just as importantly, it drives results that are recognizable, expected and that serve as clear evidence of progress toward the vision.  It serves as an example for all stakeholders, that demonstrates that the the organization is, in fact, serious about its vision. That articulation also provides essential context by which business and other entities consider their fit when operating within Hamilton. 


The Hamiltonian, the Perspectives Virtual panel and others who contributed toward this topic, were understandably dissapointed over the lack of participation of the majority of city council. It is truly worrisome that the majority of our elected council, many of which were in place when the vision was created, are unwilling or unable to enunciate their interpretation of the vision and perhaps speak about the efforts of council to lead.


I stated that it was in bad form for the majority of council not to participate in this discussion. My view remains unchanged. 


What remains is a double vision- the first is the public face of the vision- the one that is often quoted, referenced and touted and that many still believe in or, want to believe in. The other is the version that is left to chance, misinterpretation, lack of definition or proper anchoring and, in the end, whatever our directing minds (councillors)  individually believe it to be. 


Teresa DiFalco, Publisher, The Hamiltonian

No disguise for that double vision

26 comments:

  1. My hats is off to you Teresa. I am proud of you and this site for never backing down. Very well expressed! Thanks for telling it the way it is. I am so dissapointed in Farr, Morelli, Collins, Jackson, Duvall, Whitehead, Clark, Pearson, Johnson, Ferguson, Powers, Psauta and Partridge. In my opinion. if they won't or can't participate in this important issue, we need to remind people at every chance and just before the next election. Where is leadership?

    Severn

    ReplyDelete
  2. Come on Teresa. Can't we talk about sidewalk cracks, potholes, and things that are important? lol

    Mr. Sarc

    Good piece. I wonder how many of our council will actually understand it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJune 01, 2012

    To use another song from the era "Right, right, you're bloody well right!!"

    A lot of wisdom in this article. Read it a few times Tom J.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Teresa. Everything you wrote is absolutely true.


    Example: Is reducing speed limits consistent with The Best Place to Raise a Child? Answer Yes. Are we doing it Answer No

    The vision has been reduced to a slogan, no doubt and based on the fact that less that 50% of city staff have a performance contract in place, we are simply floundering. Because Hamilton is not serious about its vision, it will be whatever is the flavour of the day; which, most of the time, tastes awful.

    Cities without great vision and leadership are, well,...like Hamilton. Sadly.
    Sorce

    Where did our friend Term Limits Now go?

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJune 02, 2012

    Term Limits has been hijacked?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Term Limits NowJune 03, 2012

      Not hijacked at all. Just taking comfort in the fact that each times a councilor speaks about term limits. or doesn't speak about something important, they are just makling the case for term limits. Let's hope some of them, including the new ones, start realizing just how badly they are being received and step down voluntarily. No use continuing on with the embrassment or not even being ablr to express the vision for Hamilton. Teresa and company, your read on this is absolutely correct. Keep asking the hard questions that need to be answered.

      Term Limits Now

      Delete
  6. Teresa,

    Very well written. This is exactly what a vision statement is supposed to be and to do. I would encourage all the recalcitrant Councillors to read this piece. It might help them to understand what they're missing, not to mention not doing.

    And BTW, that Lloyd Ferguson must be the hardest working guy in show business. He still hasn't found time from his busy schedule to respond. Giving you a heads up that he was busy at the time, and weeks later still not having responded, is remarkable. 24/7 I guess.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 02, 2012

      I agree with you Mr. Crawford. We as citizens should expect and demand more. I work in health care where the best place to raise a child, is only a mirage.

      Delete
  7. North EnderJune 02, 2012

    If I were a counselor or a senior person in the city, I would be embarrassed to read this. Maybe we need term limits and a clean up at the top of the bureacracy too.

    North Ender

    ReplyDelete
  8. SerendipityJune 02, 2012

    Teresa, this is such an excellent, profound piece of writing, thank you. Required reading for concillors and upper management.

    I wholeheartedly agree “that it was in bad form for the majority of council not to participate in this discussion. My view remains unchanged.” My view remains unchanged as well, however after reading Farr’s solicited comments in two articles on Raise The Hammer, my sheer disappointment in him has reached a new low.

    The two articles I refer to are dated May 28 and June 1 of this year; Farr’s first comments in May come a full nineteen(?) days after The Hamiltonian reached out to him for comment to their “best place to raise a child” question and, perhaps, commenting on the excellent responses from the Virtual Panel. Both articles in RTH have to do with children in that they address both the HWDSB decision not to move to the cannon knitting mills bldg in Beasley neighbourhood, and his support, and that of six neighbourhood associations in his ward, for making streets in Hamilton more walkable/liveable.

    How thoughtful, intelligent and courteous it would have been of Farr to have responded to The Hamiltonian and the Virtual Panel by mentioning both his unique initiative (to move board to Cannon St) and his full support for walkable/liveable streets and to simply tie these two points in to a response to The Hamiltonian back in early May.

    Inexcusable. Short-sighted. Disrespectful. Just plain dumb…I can’t figure Farr out. But, I do wish he were on a Term Limits leash.

    ReplyDelete
  9. EXCELLENT opinion piece Teresa! Love to meet with you over coffe one day and share some ideas. I admire your work and have heard so much about you. I will send my contact information to the email address.

    Ron

    ReplyDelete
  10. I re-read this article again and am flabbergasted at how much good insight and information is packed into this. It's like a recipe for success. The folks at the hall need to pay attention!

    Severn

    ReplyDelete
  11. Farm GirlJune 03, 2012

    Great article. I agree that it is the an elected responsibility to engage with the people that pay them. I am very disappointed with my councillor for not participating. She was impressive at first but seems to be slipping quickly. I don't understand why these titles change people. They should remember how they got these jobs and remember that it can be easily taken away. I not impressed.

    Farm Girl

    ReplyDelete
  12. Term Limits NowJune 03, 2012

    As I mentioned before, I don't feel that I need to write much. Just keep watching what our council fails to do. Only 3 of them have answered the vision question. Why? Because they can't lead perhaps?

    Term Limits Now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 04, 2012

      As mentioned in the past, there are many Councillors that will not respond.

      Delete
  13. AnonymousJune 04, 2012

    Very informative read. Thank-you.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The Spectator Linc defined The Hamiltonian as unmediated.

    This could be due to the Anonymous factor. Most if not all the other blog writers are transparent and have names and email addresses made public.

    This in turn, might offer a smokin' gun WHY council members have chosen not to reply too the Virtual Panel.

    Whitehead's remarks on Laura Babcock's Lare, did not ellude his feelings of getting scars from having blogged on The Hamiltonian.

    Not sure what to think, but it seems we have hit a wall. It is my school of thought to believe, a public servant, a person in the media light, ethically should respond in someway. It is not good politics, nor public relations to hold up the hand with a strong message of NO COMMENT!! No comments just don't cut the grade. Less is not more in this case.
    Just plain ol' truth and honesty. Whatever happened to that concept?

    Not sure whatthe Spectator meant by unmediated either.

    Also, this is such a well written piece Teresa, it truly articulates exactly what a vision mindset looks like.

    Brilliant!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. City HallerJune 04, 2012

      In the circles I travel, the refusal of our beloved politicians to respond to this question, is causing them more harm than they know. That's part of living in the bubble I guess.

      City Haller

      Delete
  15. Very well written Teresa!

    Not only do your words speak volumes ~ the lyrics to double vision are appropriate...and I had to chuckle because the name of the band is ‘Foreigner’...Was that tongue and cheek, to suggest that we, the bloggers are now Foreigners or our Elected Officials?

    I totally respect and very much appreciate all of the fantastic work The Hamiltonian does, yet ~ wonder how we can change the outcome of the non responsive Councillors?
    Do we respectfully ask that they take the time to sit down together and discuss what their ‘vision’ is for the best place to raise a child?

    Give them the month of June to join together and send us an opinion as a group?

    Encourage them to ‘cut and paste’ from the Virtual Panel’s Opinions?

    The tragedy of a HAMILTON CHILD ~ Felicia Floriani (her remains were discovered yesterday) surely to Heavens ‘hit home’ with anyone that cares about children!The obvious message here is that we failed this little girl miserably!

    We need to keep our ‘chosen ones’ engaged...how do we change their lack of response back to showing us that they want to remain committed to expressing their thoughts?

    IMHO the timing of Felicia’s tragic life and death is a WAKE UP CALL ~ to EVERYONE, and moving forward, I am respectfully requesting that our Councillors not shy away from the TOUGH STUFF ~ I am pleading with them to step up and voice their thoughts on how they (if not as Leaders) as decent human beings; address this little girl’s end ~ to ENSURE that it never happens again.

    Thank you Teresa, keep up the amazing work!!!

    Have a great day everyone, and please bow your head in silence for Hamilton’s angel~ Felicia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SerendipityJune 05, 2012

      "Do we respectfully ask that they take the time to sit down together and discuss what their ‘vision’ is for the best place to raise a child?"

      The Hamiltonian respectfully asked that councillors take the time back in early May; disrespectfully, and silently, all, save for two, councillors declined.
      I now believe it was not a coincidence that the majority of councillors didn't respond; rather, they talked amongst themselves and made the joint decision not to respond...it was coordinated and transparently disrespectful. Shame on all of them.

      Delete
    2. I agree with you. There is no will to sit down and talk about this, even though it is the most important topic that we could be talking about. I am very dissapointed in the mainstream media who seems to be paying attention to all the petty things. :-(

      Severn

      Delete
  16. Danya

    You are correct about the importance of this issue and the importance of hearing from our council. I think the vision question was posed on The Hamiltonian in a respectful way, and a panel of Hamiltonians gave their best advice and observations. Council should have taken that advice very seriously and should have engaged in a discussion with us.

    To answer your question, sadly, you can't beat a dead horse. If we cannot expect their views on such a critical topic and if we have examples where CHILDREN are being left behind, then this council needs to be replaced.
    Sorce

    ReplyDelete
  17. Don't you think this is more important? http://www.thespec.com/news/local/article/737820--i-heart-my-pet-idea-quashed

    Mr. Sarc

    ReplyDelete
  18. North EnderJune 05, 2012

    Maybe there should be an

    "anyone but Farr, Morelli, Collins, Jackson, Duvall, Whitehead, Clark, Pearson, Johnson, Ferguson, Powers, Psauta and Partridge" campaign leading up to the next election?

    North Ender

    ReplyDelete
  19. I have never heard the process described better.

    Rod

    ReplyDelete
  20. Any further responses from councillors on this?
    Sorce

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.


Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.