Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Face to Face with the City Manager

As a follow up to our Virtual Panel's perspectives on the City's vision statement, I met with City Manager Chris Murray, Mike Kirkopoulos Strategic Communications Program Manager and Paul Johnson, Director, Neighbourhood Development Strategies.


The purpose of the meeting was for Chris to talk about the strategic plan and how it supports the city's vision to be, amongst other things, The Best Place to Raise a Child in Canada.

Chris described a very thorough and thoughtful process whereby the strategic plan was validated and sought input from his Senior Management Team through to the Manager/Supervisor level. Chris described the importance of consultation and invitation to contribute to the plan, rather than the imposition of one. The effort was described as well received and productive. 

Chris explained that there are three thrusts to the strategic plan. The first centers on Prosperity and Healthy Neighbourhoods and he specifically referenced challenges in neighbourhoods in the lower city. He cited Paul Johnson's role as coordinating all the various programs and services and to work with neighbourhoods and the work he is doing with some of these neighbourhoods.  

Chris provided context in terms of facing an aging population over the next decade that may not have access to pensions or well paying pensions. He mentioned the issue of poverty and also low income. He cautioned that we must make deliberate attempts to swing the ratio of the residential vs. non residential tax base. The idea being, to take a significant amount of the burden away from residential tax payers. Chris said that in Hamilton, 6% of household income was assigned to property taxes. He cited this as high, although he was clear that this does not mean that we have the highest taxes- only that as a percentage of income, the amount assigned to taxes is high. Bringing jobs and commercial interests to Hamilton will thus be a priority.

The second area Chris mentioned is Service Delivery. This involves being clear on the services the city provides and the notion of value for money. Who's accountable for them? How much are we spending on these services and are we getting value for money, as compared to other municipalities? 

The third area Chris highlighted was leadership. Chris spoke of paying attention to the image issue, in terms of how we conduct business and provide services. Also, how we interact with council and other levels of government. He also mentioned a focus on management of overall workforce and succession planning. 

Chris also mentioned that council did not feel a need to change the vision statement, as it should stand the test of time. 

I made the following "counter-balance" points  for Chris's consideration:

The need to balance the attention on driving up the non residential tax base, against the need to have our residential streets safe and free from expressway-like conditions, based on the volume and nature of traffic. I  stressed  the need for evidence-based thinking and that the evidence is clear that traffic on residential streets, and the volume and nature of that traffic, has a causal and inverse relationship to the health and well being of people; and that people, are the ultimate enablers of success. How that balance would be achieved was a point of query.

I raised the question of how the city would be dealing with the present conditions that served as a disconnect between what the vision aspires to, and the real conditions on the ground vis a vis expressway like traffic on residential and city roads.

Chris described a process whereby the Chief Medical Officer of Health would not only be called upon to ensure programs and services related to public health were properly executed, but that she would be used as a strategic adviser to ensure that the balance between healthy neighbourhoods and commercial growth, was respected and to help shape future efforts.

I suggested that the city needs to reach out to all community associations and to citizens across the city, so as to recognize that there are issues that need addressing beyond a selected area (lower city/downtown core).

I identified the need for public reporting on measurables , beyond a yearly report to council and the need to keep citizen informed regularly of progress and initiatives.

I will have more information to share with you from this meeting. For the moment, I thought I would provide a synopsis of this meeting.

It seems that the city has undertaken a very thoughtful process. The proof will be whether it will be translated into measurable and evident progress that will inspire greater confidence and belief in our vision and its attainment.  

Teresa DiFalco
Publisher, The Hamiltonian

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousJuly 04, 2012

    Great work Ms. DiFalco. I hope you keep an eye on this!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Indeed - great work Teresa. Thanks for the synopsis of your meeting with Chris Murray. I look foward to the additional information.

    Donna

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would like to know what the city is doing to live up to their vision statement. From what I see, the city keeps getting worse. I'm glad that Teresa asked that consideration be given to all communities and not just the downtown area. I was married to Hamilton by the amalgamation. We once had great services and councillors that were attentive. Since amalgamation, all of that has changed for the worse. Im also glad that Teresa asked about the crazy traffic on residential streets. To me, and I am sure thousands of others, this would be a priority in making our neigbhourhoods healthier, safer and be more aligned with the city's vision statement.

    I too look forward to seeing more information about this.

    Ricky G.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gail BlackJuly 04, 2012

    Sounds like you had a good meeting with the city manager. I agree that the city needs to engage more with community associations. Our group has been trying to get their attention for years but all we get is the run-around. It is very fustrating. Can't wait to learn more about this city plan and what the 3 thrusts are and how they tie into the vision statement. A link to the virtual panel discussion on the best place to raise a child would also be helpful for quick referencing. I remember it was an excellent read, as was your opinion piece on the topic. Thanks Teresa.

    Gail Black

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJuly 05, 2012

    This explains a few things to me. I don't see that there will be enough emphasis on traffic issues because it will be focused on driving up the commercial tax base. Because we are desperate as a city, we'll take anything. Thats how it seems. So, if that means more traffic, so be it. Its funny that traffic again was not mentioned until you asked about it. I think a lot of people are going to choke on traffic fumes, especially in this weather and you hit the nail right on the head! If we are making people sick, what's the point?

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.


Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.