Monday, May 16, 2016

Bubble Trouble?

Clr. Collins thinks a referendum on the LRT issue is necessary to ensure all Hamiltonians are heard. Clr. Merulla appears to believe that a referendum is like a poll or snapshot and should not be relied on. Further, he seems to suggest that it is a cop out of sorts on the leadership front. Clr. Green suggests a referendum is irresponsible and 'ridiculous', given that the funds are coming from the province. Clr. Aidan Johnson suggests that referendums can over simplify complex issues. (see Spec article by clicking here ) 

While all these varying opinions swirl about, it is undeniable that the 2014 election yielded a turn out of only 34.02% of eligible voters. 

The LRT issue sounds like it is bubbling to the surface once more. 


  1. AnonymousMay 16, 2016

    So, over 65% of eligible voters in Hamilton, did not vote. So, any of the counselors cannot say that they truly represent the masses. So, it follows that a referendum is needed and warranted. Collins is the only one with his head on straight.

  2. its certain that councillors who oppose a vote dont think voters matter

  3. AnonymousMay 17, 2016

    Yes, let's refuse $1B in transformational infrastructure investment for a project that has years of supportive data and studies (and unanimous council votes, occasionally) to its credit. Then we can do away with mock indignity when our requests for sprawl-supportive stopgap funding is declined as throwing good money after bad. Hamilton as been at war with its own best interests for over 40 years. Why stop now?

  4. AnonymousMay 17, 2016

    A referendum would resolve the issue of whether there is large scale support for LRT.

  5. AnonymousMay 18, 2016

    Referendum Question: Do you agree with spending $1 million to conduct a non-binding public opinion poll?


    1. yes hold the referendum and make it binding

    2. AnonymousMay 19, 2016

      "There have been no binding referendums in Canada"


    3. I am aware of that, doesnt mean there shouldnt be


Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.

Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.