;;

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Food for Thought with Alex Bielak - A Coffee Drinker’s Dilemma

A Coffee Drinker’s Dilemma (Part 1)

Like many, I love a great cup of coffee in the morning. Most of my life my preference has been for espresso, and latterly decaf espresso. I love it so much, my graduation present to myself 30-years ago was a heavy-duty manual Gaggia machine to replace the little stove top espresso makers still in the basement.

Once the brewing head on the Gaggia succumbed to metal failure I quickly got another, a Saeco: after a decade of regular use it became terminally clogged with lime buildup and exploded in the kitchen one morning. A noble end to a good friend.

Lesson learnt, I now regularly de-scale my current Saeco semi-automatic. Not as finicky as the manuals, it

pulls up to 14 consistent shots of espresso before needing tending, very handy for dinner parties.

For when I want a full cup of Joe, I also have a slew of other gadgets including a Melitta cone drip filter, Bodum French Press and, the latest toy, the Aeropress which makes very good coffee indeed.

To get the obvious question out of the way, yes decaf beans can be easily as good as the caffeinated variety, which I will occasionally revert to if nothing else is available. Currently I use Kicking Horse Cliffhanger decaf espresso: It is made with the (chemical-free) Swiss Water Process and is both organic and fair trade. In the past I liked the Starbucks decaf, but switched when I found the process for that blend was not Swiss Water. I also occasionally used Illy decaf coffee: in its fancy tin, it is very aromatic and flavourful, but very pricey.

I also like my Timmies when I’m on the road, and will occasionally succumb to the lure of Starbucks. I’ve said it previously (Food for Thought #23), I think the $2 “Coffee and a Car” deal at Casteleyn Chocolates in Burlington is an amazing deal, and also like the great coffee shops in Dundas and Waterdown’s cozy JitterBug Java.

I think it is fair to say we have firmly established that I am willing to go to great lengths to get my decaf fix, if that’s not an oxymoron. So why is it, at the office, I’ve defaulted to drinking tea?

The reason is, for me, making coffee would involve grinding beans etc. and then cleaning up the resultant mess: I simply don’t have the time and energy for that.

The alternative usually involves some sort of complex “coffee club” arrangement that inevitably guarantees an awful experience, if indeed the last person has left anything in the machine! The coffee is sourced from giant tins of cheap, stale, pre-ground beans, stewed in a machine stained with calcium deposits, and left to marinate on a hot plate until someone takes the resultant tar out of everyone’s misery. (Ok I exagerrate, but you get the picture.) 


My last place of work had both the aforementioned communal system, as well as a wonderful Francis Francis Y1 machine, made specifically to take Illy capsules. The taste in the latter was everything a great espresso should be, but at almost a buck a shot – not to mention the cost of the machine - they were a serious indulgence.

During a recent trip I was happy to find a Nespresso machine and pods in my room. It had replaced the horrid little facsimile of the office system common in hotels around the world. It produced far better coffee than I’ve ever had in a hotel room, and the tea produced didn’t taste like coffee. A plus for my tea-drinking wife.

I’ve returned to another workplace now and found while I was away, they acquired a Keurig machine. Everyone was loading it up with their choice of beverage, from regular Colombian to Mars Bar flavoured coffees, to a variety of teas. It seemed quick, convenient and mess-free and a great way to change it up from my endless cups of tea.

Having scrounged the odd K-Cup (as they are officially called), and overcoming my distaste at the un-ecological nature of the process, I sprang for a six-pack of Van Houtte decaf pods from a supermarket.

They produced adequate coffee, but I thought there had to be something a lot better out there. A visit to the sparkling, new location of ECS Coffee on the North Service Road in Burlington yielded a myriad of options including for both the Keurig, and its competitor in the single cup brewing system market, Tassimo.

In my next column I’ll review a baker’s dozen of coffees from various companies and sources, and we’ll see how they stack up against my long time favourites.

In the interim I’d be interested to hear which caffeine delivery system Food for Thought Readers prefer.


For more pictures, click here

Alex (Alex can be reached at fft@thehamiltonian.info ) or on twitter @AlexBielak

Food for Thought logo, designed and kindly donated by Ninka Bielak. Ninka can be reached at ninka.bielak@gmail.com.

6 comments:

  1. A coffee club can be a grind, but automated pods are awful -- recyclable only if you bother to disassemble the components of each pod (plastic, metal, paper, coffee) and treat them accordingly. Moreover, the coffee isn't even that good. Nor are you able to adjust intensity of brew. But it does create durable landfill.

    http://www.treehugger.com/sustainable-product-design/kuerig-and-other-coffee-pods-piling-landfills-across-america.html

    I have been a solo javanaut since university and have found two technologies that never fail to yield great coffee: the French press (http://www.bodum.com/ca) and its more recent mutation, the Aeropress (http://www.aeropress.ca), both of which produce no waste outside of green-binnables.

    http://www.bodum.com/ca/en-us/shop/detail/10358-16US/?navid=262

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alex BielakJanuary 20, 2013

    Thanks so much for the comment. Watch for the second part of the column!
    Alex Bielak

    ReplyDelete
  3. SerendipityJanuary 22, 2013

    Hello Alex, I do enjoy reading your pieces.
    I came to coffee late in life, at 37, and regard it as a delicious, morning-only liquid dessert that I drink during breakfast. I prefer organic Costa Rican coffee beans, Braun grinder, and a French press. I always let my boiling water sit for a minute or so before pouring in the press, add a dash of cinnamon and stir. Three minutes later, and the addition of cream and a tiny pour of light-grade maple syrup, I enjoy a delicious cup of coffee with my breakfast.
    Have tried Tim's, Second Cup and the usual suspects, but have yet to taste a cuppa coffee that I love as much as my own morning treat.
    Have never heard of the Aeropress before but will check it out. Thanks Alex.


    ReplyDelete
  4. Alex BielakJanuary 22, 2013

    Thanks Serendipity:
    I'd always heard that the French Press should have the coffee sit four minutes. One of the interesting things about the Aeropress is that there is only ten seconds of stirring involved before pressing. And the ideal temperature of the water is far lower than anywhere else I've seen. It does make v good coffee and their website has a neat video showing the simplicity of the system.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Alex - I just returned to the French press after a few years using a Cuisinart grind-and-brew. What is nice about the press is that the cleanup is quick and it doesn't take up much room in the kitchen. Also, I am drinking my coffee black as part of New Year austerity so I find that I am more attentive to the quality of preparation than I have been for some time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Alex BielakJanuary 27, 2013

    Thanks for your comment BabyJu.
    We just made a couple of FP's yesterday a.m. as we had company and wanted to make several cups. Cleanup was frankly tedious as the grounds were hot and sloppy. If it were not for the quantity the Aeropress would have been not fuss no muss. And my Saeco, even less

    All the best

    Alex Bielak

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.

This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.