Resolution or Revolution? The Water Pressure is High.

As The Hamiltonian has been covering the ongoing labour disruption involving the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA), it is important to provide clarity regarding who is responding to what.

On June 12, 2025, we published a piece entitled Water Fight, which can be found by clicking here.

Today, in response to a request for comment that we made to City Manager Marnie Cluckie, we received the following statement, which we have been asked to attribute more broadly to the City of Hamilton:

"Thank you for your inquiry. Our response is captured in the The City Manager’s statement shared on June 12, 2025. We remain open to returning to the bargaining table with HOWEA.

If you would like more information, please visit our website at https://www.hamilton.ca/city-council/howea-labour-disruption-updates.

The City Manager and other management are available for further conversation if needed."

On June 18, The Hamiltonian published its own view on what a fair solution to the strike might be. That piece can be found by clicking here.  We shared this link with all members of City Council, the Mayor, the City Manager, and Greg Hoath, Business Manager of the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA).

Following that, Greg Hoath responded to The Hamiltonian’s view. In an email sent to The Hamiltonian—copied to all members of City Council, the Mayor, and the City Manager—he wrote:

"Hamiltonian

The IUOE Local 772 couldn’t agree more with your analysis. Pay Equity is not simply a gender based equity but extends to injustice in wage rates where qualifications, skills and certification requirements are in question.

The City can maintain its integrity of pattern bargaining to achieve what it perceives as fiscal responsibility while addressing the pay equity for 54 water & wastewater employees.

The labour disruption should never happened and wasting taxpayers dollars needs to end. Provide the parity in the first year and return the employees to work.

We thank the Hamiltonian for its continuing interest and thoughtful independent analysis.

Regards
Greg Hoath
Business Manager IUOE 772

It would therefore appear that one side in this dispute finds The Hamiltonian’s view agreeable. The question remains: Does the City of Hamilton?

As the City’s latest release (quoted above) closes with: “The City Manager and other management are available for further conversation if needed,” The Hamiltonian will  ask City Manager Marnie Cluckie to indicate whether the City is willing to consider the path to resolution espoused in The Hamiltonian’s view.

To be very clear: The Hamiltonian is taking no side in this matter. Our view was clinical, carefully considered, and rooted in fairness. The only side we are on is that of everyday Hamiltonians!

Stay tuned...We will publish the response we receive.

Update: Here is a response received June 20 @ 8:25pm from Greg Hoath

"The IUOE Local 772 is always prepared to return to bargaining. However, there is only one issue, equal pay for equal work. Base rate for operators $41.35 the same as other similar positions in the City of Hamilton and $44.50 for Instrumentation Techs, Electricians and Millwrights the same as the City trades. Pay equity is not just gender based but also qualification based.

As a born and bred Hamiltonian and long time taxpayer, I am irate at the willingness of the City Manager Cluckie and Mayor Horwath and council, to waste excessive taxpayers dollars on an unnecessary labour disruption. The cost to date is likely double the settlement. We believe the City should disclose the costs and be accountable, not retreat, hide and act like cowards. 

We need to return to work with fairness, end the 20 years of injustice, award parity and end the taxpayer waste Mayor Horwath and City Manager Cluckie."

With Ward 3 Councillor Nrinder Nann

Enjoy our chat with Ward 3 Councillor Nrinder Nann.  Clr. Nana is now listed on our Star Wards list which you can see here.

1. Your tenure as Ward 3 City Councillor includes a focus on equity and inclusion. Can you discuss some of the specific initiatives you've implemented to promote these values in Hamilton?

As Hamilton’s first racialized woman elected to City Council, I get this question a lot! 

Sidewalk snow removal address the inequities faced by folks with disabilities, those who use mobility devices, seniors, parents who push kids in strollers, and others who struggled getting to the bus on snowy, icy and slippery sidewalks is a perfect example of an equity and inclusion based policy change that has improved access to public transit for all in the winter. 

The Vacant Unit Tax is an equity based tax policy that aims to increase housing supply by creating an incentive for property owners to sell unoccupied homes or make them available to be rented.  

During a nation-wide housing crisis, and in Hamilton where the cost of housing has sky-rocketed over the past decade, it is critical to pull every lever available to the city to help ensure availability of housing. For those sitting on properties, purposely kept empty, to speculate future wealth generation, they clearly have the means to pay more taxes which in turn the city can use to help fund new affordable and supportive housing. 

The practice of bad-faith renovictions was also a widespread inequity in neighbourhoods across the city. Championing the development of Ontario’s first Renovation License and Relocation By-law, Safe Apartments By-law, and the Tenant Defense Fund along-side renters is another specific initiative that demonstrates an equity approach to municipal government that I am proud of delivering on behalf of Hamiltonians who rent. 

Another tangible example of an equity approach was to ensure the new Truck Route took heavy, polluting trucks that made many residents feel unsafe in their communities out of neighbourhood roadways. This addressed the inequity many school zones faced in the lower city in comparison to other, more economically secure areas of the city, that never have had to contend with walking to school while a semi-truck whizzed by creating a harsh and hostile environment.

I worked with survivors and their supporters to declare gender-based and intimate partner violence an epidemic in Hamilton, giving voice to safety concerns women and gender diverse people face. This has resulted in better funding for support services in urban and rural neighbourhoods to help address needs.

I have also focused on addressing needs in Ward 3 neighbourhoods that have experienced historic underfunding of municipal investment as it relates to roads, parks and other infrastructure, specifically north of Main St. This is an example of equity based capital investment.

I guess you can say that equity, inclusion and accessibility is embedded into all of my work and I believe our city shines with more love and respect as a result.

2. Community engagement is a cornerstone of your approach. How do you ensure that residents are actively involved in decision-making processes, and can you share examples of successful community-led initiatives?

Direct and regular resident and community engagement is a cornerstone of democracy that every elected representative needs to integrate into how we do our work as it relates to governance and responding to emerging/historic needs in our areas.

I hold an annual town hall meeting and at least 12 pop-up office hour sessions each year throughout Ward 3 ensuring to make myself and my office team available to residents in every neighbourhood. 

I publish a regular e-newsletter after each Council meeting and an annual Impact Report to ensure

With Paul Berton

We’re pleased to welcome Paul Berton as a guest on The Hamiltonian. A respected voice in Canadian journalism and longtime friend of The Hamiltonian, Paul brings a wealth of insight and experience to the media landscape. As former Editor-in-Chief of The Hamilton Spectator and The London Free Press, Paul has not only witnessed but helped shape the evolving trends in media. Enjoy our chat with Paul.

In the shift from print to digital, what do you think mainstream outlets gained—and what have they lost? 

We gain casual readers, but lose dedicated readers, those who had a newspaper “habit” -- they need to find that newspaper on their doorstep every morning, and read it cover to cover. Digital readers pick and choose what to read from a variety of sources. There is a lot of competition for their attention, and their habits change quickly. Advertisers, meanwhile, are abandoning traditional news sources for social media or Google, where their money doesn’t just leave the community, it leaves the country. Still, I believe the pendulum is swinging back to where digital readers are returning to just one or a few outlets they can trust.

How has the rise of social media changed the relationship between news organizations and their audiences? 

It’s more of a conversation rather than a lecture. So that’s good. But misinformation and disinformation have run rampant. Too many people do not scrutinize what they hear and see, tend to believe unbelievable things, and do not grasp the lengths to which legacy media go to confirm information, check facts, and reduce bias – it’s key to our reputation as trusted news providers. Some readers even accuse us of withholding information they believe is true because they’ve seen it on social media, but we won’t publish anything until we can verify it. Beyond that, social media seems to have encouraged a lot more anger, outrage and downright nastiness. It’s unfortunate.

Do you believe the core principles of journalism—such as objectivity, accuracy, and accountability—are still intact in today’s media landscape? Why or why not?

I think they are as intact as ever, although it may not seem that way sometimes. For reasons of politics and profit, there have always been bad actors. William Randolph Hearst is blamed/credited with inventing yellow journalism a century ago. Janet Cooke, Jason Blair and Stephen Glass are famous for making things up decades ago. Rupert Murdoch’s News Of The World closed after the appalling phone-hacking scandal more recently. But running through it all has been a commitment by other outlets to report the news responsibly and objectively for the benefit of all.

Fake News- it’s a relatively new term that is being thrown about quite often. Can you talk about the fake news phenomenon and how it may impact real news?

Resolving the Water Strike: The Case for Pragmatic Flexibility

The Hamiltonian's View

The ongoing strike between the City of Hamilton and the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA), now entering its second month, presents a test of municipal labour relations. At issue is a classic tension between maintaining pattern bargaining — which ensures consistency across the City’s unionized workforce — and recognizing the unique circumstances of a small but highly skilled group of workers.

The City has followed a consistent wage settlement pattern across eight of its 11 bargaining units, with agreements in place covering over 6,000 workers. The current offer to HOWEA is consistent with that pattern, featuring wage increases in the range of 4.7% per year, faster progression through pay grades, and improved premiums and benefits.

HOWEA, representing just over 50 operators and tradespeople, argues that its members face a historic pay gap relative to similar city employees. More importantly, these workers operate one of Ontario’s only combined water and wastewater systems — requiring four separate Class III certifications. This multi-skilled requirement distinguishes them from peers elsewhere and, in their view, justifies an upward wage adjustment beyond the pattern.

From a labour relations standpoint, both perspectives are valid. Pattern bargaining preserves fiscal discipline and avoids competitive wage demands. However, when clear evidence of skill-based inequities exists — as is arguably the case here — an inflexible application of the pattern risks entrenching unfairness.

A targeted, skills-based wage adjustment for HOWEA members — framed explicitly as compensation for certifications and dual-role responsibilities — would resolve the strike without undermining the integrity of the City’s bargaining framework. This approach would acknowledge the operators’ unique qualifications while signalling to other unions that the pattern remains intact for all but exceptional cases.

Additionally, the fiscal impact is minimal: the union’s proposed adjustment reportedly amounts to less than 0.01% of the City’s annual budget — a fraction of the potential costs of prolonged disruption or future recruitment and retention challenges in this critical service area.

Ultimately, public sector bargaining requires more than adherence to formulas. It demands the pragmatism to address real-world disparities where they exist. A narrow exception here —supported by clear public communication and prudent political leadership — would serve the broader public interest: a stable, well-staffed water system operated by motivated employees.

The elements for a settlement are present. The time has come for both sides to exercise flexibility, close the gap, and move forward. The public deserves no less.

Water Fight- Screen Shot

In the ongoing dispute between the City of Hamilton and its water workers, the latest development comes in the form of a screen capture.

Greg Hoath, Business Manager of the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA), has provided The Hamiltonian with a screenshot from the SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system. According to Hoath, the image indicates that the recent water discolouration issue was the result of operator error—contrary to the City’s assertion that the incident was unrelated to the ongoing labour disruption.The screenshot is below:

The following is the explanation of the screen shot, as provided by Mr. Hoath

Explanation of SCADA from our operators.Temperature in the station 30 degrees. Pumps cooking because air locked. Suction pressure 0 kpa. And low level float triggered. The fact that it's 30 degrees in the station proves that it wasn't a planned event

Note from The Hamiltonian: Although it appears Mr. Hoath may have scored a point in this latest exchange, The Hamiltonian strongly encourages both sides (The City and the Union) to get together soon and compromise. The union members deserve proper recognition and compensation. and the City is entitled to be fiscally responsible. Something has to give.

For those of you who want a quick summary of what the issues are, click here.

Water Fight- Hoath Outraged

While the phrase “Water Fight” may offer a clever characterization of the dispute between the City of Hamilton and its water workers, the matter at hand is no laughing matter. It is a serious issue with significant implications for public trust and labour relations.

In response to the City’s official press release, available here we posed two questions to Greg Hoath, Business Manager of IUOE Local 772: 

1. The City’s press release attributes the water quality complaints in Ward 10 to planned maintenance work and emphasizes that these issues were unrelated to the labour disruption. In light of the Ministry’s findings, does HOWEA still maintain that the public was misinformed, and if so, what specific concerns does the union have regarding the City’s public communications or safety protocols during the disruption?

2. Given the Ministry's conclusion that there were no regulatory or safety violations, what outcome or assurance is HOWEA seeking on behalf of its members and the public with respect to how water service issues and emergency plans are communicated and handled during labour disputes?

Mr. Hoath responded as follows: 

We are disappointed in the Ministry of Environment as they have not responded to many of our requests. The Stoney Creek matter, with no water followed by brown water was not planned maintenance. If so, the affected areas would have been notified. We received inside information with screenshot of the SCADA system screen. SCADA is the computer monitoring system. The reservoir ran dry, the pumps ran dry and became air locked, the station overheated and it was operator error.

We remain concerned as all 54 employees are provincially certified and licensed at a high level. Qualifications and experience are unique to the Hamilton facilities. There are over 170 outstations, wastewater collection sites, wells and reservoirs. The work is reactive and with older equipment requires subtle and timely manipulation that only the most experienced operators can manage. Water main breaks occur this time of year when pressures are not properly maintained. Several occurred early on costing taxpayers thousands in unnecessary repairs.

We were essential during crisis like Covid and disposable at contract time, despite managers receiving greater than 30% increases.

Again, this strike is about $300000 in pay equity internal parity with other City employees in water wastewater who require much less certifications. To use an analogy, it would be like telling an RN in a hospital, you should accept a lower rate of pay than an Environmental Aide?

We want to be back at work but the City must recognize this 20 year old inequity and fix it now. Rather than spending millions on an unnecessary labour disruption. As a born and bred Hamiltonian and taxpayer I am outraged.

Media Release: City of Hamilton- Hamilton's Water Quality

Ministry review confirms no issues with City of Hamilton’s water quality and safety

HAMILTON, ON – The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) has reviewed information from Hamilton Water regarding water quality complaints in Ward 10 on May 20-21, 2025. The Ministry review found no issues with regulatory compliance or public safety. These findings were communicated to the City on June 13, 2025.

The City appreciates the Ministry taking action to review and provide recommendations that will help inform future operational and emergency planning.

The MECP review stems from public complaints raised about misinformation circulated during the ongoing labour disruption between the City and the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA). The City has been working closely with MECP throughout the labour disruption, ensuring full awareness and approval on all labour disruption contingency planning.
Reports of low water pressure and quality in Ward 10

The City received some reports on May 20-21, 2025, from residents in the Stoney Creek area (Ward 10) about low water pressure and discoloured (cloudy or yellow-brown) water. In total, six low pressure complaints and four water quality complaints were reported. It is important to note that in a city with the population the size of Hamilton, these are considered low numbers.

City Staff responded immediately to these reports by flushing local water mains. The cause of the issue was related to planned work that can cause area-wide pressure changes - in this case, low pressure - and temporary discolouration. The issues are not related to the ongoing labour disruption.

“To all residents in Hamilton: please know that your water remains safe and essential services are being delivered,” said City Manager Marnie Cluckie. “I appreciate the Ministry’s review that validates there is no risk to the quality or safety of drinking water, and that the City continues to meet all regulatory requirements.”

Stay up to date on the labour disruption, including what residents need to know and frequently asked questions, on the City's website at www.hamilton.ca/LabourDisruption. 
Additional Resources:City of Hamilton labour disruption webpage
Council Communication Update: Stoney Creek Water Quality – May 20 and 21, 2025 (Ward 10)

Councillor Cameron Kroetsch Reinstated

The following is a media release issued by Councillor Cameron Kroetsch concerning the investigation conducted by the Ontario Civilian Police Commission (OCPC) related to his suspension.

As readers may recall, The Hamiltonian had previously expressed concern about the prolonged delay in the release of the investigation’s findings. In pursuit of accountability and transparency, we reached out to both the Inspectorate of Policing under the Ministry of the Solicitor General and to Tribunals Ontario. Shortly thereafter, the decision was communicated to the Councillor.

We are publishing Councillor Kroetsch’s statement in full, unedited, in the spirit of open and informed public discourse.

Councillor Cameron Kroetsch Returns to the Police Board

Over a year ago, on March 8, 2024, the Ontario Civilian Police Commission suspended me from the Hamilton Police Service Board. The OCPC did this to investigate a complaint filed by the Board alleging I violated its Code of Conduct.

The OCPC has now closed the investigation and their file on the matter and has reinstated me to the Board. I will be attending this month’s meeting of the Board on June 26.

This was an exhaustive investigation. The OCPC reviewed meeting minutes and emails, watched many hours of meeting videos, and conducted several interviews before reaching their decision. After 15 months, they dismissed the allegations against me stating there was either no evidence to support them or they did not rise to the level of misconduct.

I’d hoped to be able to share the OCPC’s findings with the public at the conclusion of their investigation, but the Executive Chair of Tribunals Ontario has ruled they will not be released to anyone, including myself, or the Board.

I was personally provided with a summary of the findings against me, but I’ve been cautioned not to release them by the Executive Chair. I have, however, been granted permission to share some information at a high level.

Overall, the OCPC found -

There was no evidence to support the complaints filed against me by individual members of the Board.

The motion I put forward regarding Board surpluses at the Audit, Finance and Administration Committee did not constitute misconduct.

The comments I made online, though I was cautioned against making similar comments online in the future, did not constitute misconduct.

My attendance at a rally to support the family of Erixon Kabera did not constitute misconduct.

I took my duties as a member of the Board seriously and I was an active participant in Board meetings and processes.

I consistently promoted transparency, accountability, and better governance, and I was met with resistance from the Board when attempting to do so.

I’m glad this ordeal is over. These complaints, and the subsequent investigation by the OCPC, served to silence my voice as a public representative on the Board for more than a year.

Going forward, I intend to continue to use my time on the Board as a voice for the public. It’s in everyone’s interest to uphold the values of transparency, accountability, and good governance and I will not waver in my dedication to those values. I appreciate everyone who has reached out to me, supported me, and offered encouragement and care. I’m especially grateful for the legal support of my lawyer, Wade Poziomka, and fellow Board Member Anjali Menezes.

The work of standing up in the face of injustice is collective, carried by everyone in our community, and a testament to the strength and resilience Hamiltonians are known for.

Our work continues.
Cameron Kroetsch
Ward 2 City Councillor
Hamilton Police Service Board Member

Breaking News : Decision Rendered in Councillor Kroetsch Investigation

As previously reported, The Hamiltonian reached out to both the Inspectorate of Policing under the Ontario Solicitor General and to Tribunals Ontario to inquire about the prolonged delay in rendering a decision regarding the investigation involving Councillor Cameron Kroetsch. We expressed concern that this delay has effectively prevented Councillor Kroetsch from fulfilling his role and contributing as a voice on the Hamilton Police Services Board.

This afternoon, The Hamiltonian received confirmation from Tribunals Ontario that a decision has been made and communicated directly to Councillor Kroetsch.

Councillor Kroetsch has indicated that he will issue a public response on Monday.

Stay tuned for further updates.

Water Fight- Analysis

 

Click on Picture to enlarge it

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Conclusion:

This labour dispute is centred on differing interpretations of fairness and fiscal responsibility. The City emphasizes consistency and cost containment, while the union highlights pay equity, working conditions, and recruitment/retention challenges. Both sides claim readiness to negotiate but accuse each other of obstruction and misrepresentation. Resolution hinges on whether the City will reconsider its mandate in light of the union’s narrower, equity-based demands.

Water Fight

In the interest of fairness and balanced reporting, and following City Manager Marnie Cluckie’s recent statement regarding the labour disruption involving the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA) (see it here)—The Hamiltonian reached out to the union for comment.

Here is Greg Hoath's , Business Manager for both the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA) and the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 772, based in Hamilton, response: 

IUOE Local 772/HOWEA Business Manager Greg Hoath Press Release

We represent 430000 members in North America both in the private sector and public sector in occupations from RN’s to recycling, from Operating Engineers to Environmental Aides. We represent other members in the City of Hamilton like the engineers at Macassa and Wentworth Lodge.

In this matter we represent the 54 provincially certified and licensed Water & Wastewater Operators that require certification in Water Treatment, Wastewater Treatment, Water Distribution and Wastewater Collection at the highest level and Millwrights, Electricians and Instrument Technicians. These dedicated professionals work 24/7 outside, inside, in inclement weather, with highly dangerous chemicals and in close proximity with raw sewage. The 54 employees were deemed essential during the Covid crisis and forgotten about in bargaining.

The history is important, the issues arose during the disastrous privatization with Philip Utilities . At the time the City was deciding on a renewal contract with the company at the time American Water or returning in house. The latter occurred January 1st, 2005. We informed the Mayor and Council of the two issues that today are the subject of the strike.

At bargaining in 2020, we put the City of Hamilton on notice that if internal pay equity with Hamilton Water Distribution employees requiring significantly less certification, in fact, only level 1 in Water Distribution, a license we require at a higher level and a fair system to achieve top rate, there would be a strike. We requested to communicate to council and were denied.

In December 2024, we indeed presented the City bargaining team with those two proposals, not a long list that typically occurs at bargaining. We recognize it is more than other employees but it is a pay equity matter that exists no where else within the unionized groups.

City Manager Cluckie, with all due respect, is misleading and missing the point in her media release. The union is always available to return to the table but remains steadfast in its position of pay equity. The union has never refused. The union leadership does not make the decision the 54 members provided a strike mandate with 100% vote and rejected the same offer that Ms.Cluckie calls fair, with a 94% vote. In her statement, she is misleading in suggesting that picket activities are concerning. The police have been contacted on at least 10 occasions for frivolous and false claims, wasting valuable police resources. We have been threatened by this administration for conducting our legally protected Charter of Rights freedom to picket City properties. The City was untruthful when stating we delayed buses, we did not. We apologize to the public and employees who have experienced delays. We delay no one from going home, we delay no emergency vehicles including Darts, despite City accusations. 

We are returning to the table tomorrow, a fact the City Manager appeared to be unaware of. The fair offer mentioned is also inaccurate when she ignores those who will experience wage freezes.

We have an inability to attract and retain qualified certified experienced employees because of the low rates compared to other municipalities. Hamilton is also the only combined Water & Wastewater facility in Ontario. Despite that differential the 54 employees are only requesting the same base rate as the other City employees.

Finally, and most importantly to the public. The City cannot guarantee operations and maintenance continue uninterrupted with only two superintendents that are living on site who hold the necessary qualifications. The City already experienced no water followed by brown water in Stoney Creek, numerous water main breaks caused by unqualified staff error. A body in a seat at the facilities is not sufficient. 

Ms. Cluckie references being responsible to taxpayers. We are pleased as taxpayers ourselves that she is concerned. However, she fails to outline the tax dollars being wasted. Hired a 24/7 external security firm that is providing on site 24/7 coverage for a Monday to Friday picket line of about 5 hours. There are more security than picketers and they are being housed in a local hotel . Estimated to be in excess of $500000 wasted tax dollars. The City installed new interior black out fencing to keep the public from seeing in. It was installed after we witnessed 6 staff trying to fix sewage pumps for two days without success. One final point, the City had no issue approving in excess of 45% wage increases for its management staff including 30% not long before the strike.

In the end, we did refuse to sign a protocol that had little to do with safety but everything to do with removing our rights. This has been known by several councillors and Mayor Horwath for 20 years. The time has come to award pay equity, end the injustice, help to recruit and retain qualified personnel that jeopardizes our ability to protect drinking Water and the environment.

We urge the end of the strike. We urge the public to demand a settlement that protects tax dollars and ensures qualified staff protect such a life necessary resource that Hamiltonians can count on. It’s $300000 that represents less than 0.01% of the City of Hamilton budget. Get these 54 critical workers back to work.

Statement from City Manager Marnie Cluckie on the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA) labour disruption

HAMILTON, ON – As City Manager, I want to express my deep respect for the City’s Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA) members. The current labour disruption in no way diminishes the high regard we have for the skilled and dedicated professionals who help deliver essential services to the people of Hamilton.

The 55 HOWEA members play a vital role in the delivery of essential services across our city, and so do thousands of frontline workers – volunteer firefighters, nurses, personal support workers, waste collection operators, Ontario Works workers, transit operators and many more representing hundreds of job classifications who have already ratified collective agreements within the same financial mandate as the offer the City has presented to HOWEA.

Let me be clear: the City’s offer to the HOWEA membership is consistent with the agreements reached with eight of the City’s eleven bargaining units, representing more than 6,000 employees. The agreements are fair, responsible and negotiated in good faith.

So how does this translate to dollars? When negotiating collective agreements, the City bases its financial mandate on a percentage cost increase - not the total dollar value - of the new agreement. This ensures fairness for employees across different unions at the City, whether they have 3 or 3,000 members. While a 20% wage increase over four years for 55 employees may appear to have a small impact and be manageable in isolation, that same increase applied across our workforce would result in hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs. We simply cannot create a system where the size of a bargaining unit determines the outcome of negotiations; we need to treat employees consistently.

The City’s offer includes:

Wage increases: A new wage schedule that would deliver first-year increases of up to 6–10% for most employees, averaging 4.72% for HOWEA members.
Faster progression: Changes to make it easier and quicker for employees to reach the top of their pay band.
Enhanced premiums: Increased pay for certifications and specialized skills.
Better benefits: Expanded mental health and vision care coverage.

This offer is fair. It is aligned with the same financial mandate that guided other successful negotiations and agreements and reflects our responsibility to both employees and taxpayers.

We want to resolve this disruption as soon as possible. The City has made repeated offers to return to the bargaining table and tried to negotiate a strike and picketing protocol to reduce conflict and increase safety on picket lines. Unfortunately, these offers were rejected by union leadership.

This is disappointing, but our goal hasn’t changed: to get a fair deal and bring employees back to the important work they do.

I know this isn’t easy. Negotiations are tough and emotions can run high. But we believe this offer is fair, and we believe a resolution is possible — at the bargaining table.

Our last meeting, held at the City’s request on May 26, did not bring us closer to that goal. The union’s latest proposal included an ask for a greater increase to the new wage schedule, moving further away from the framework and further outside the City's established mandate. The union has indicated that the disruption will only end if the union’s demands are fully accepted – that is not true negotiation.

We respect the union’s legal right to strike and protest peacefully. However, I am concerned about recent reports of behaviour on the picket lines, and especially about misinformation being spread in the community – particularly around water safety. 

To all residents: your drinking water is safe. Critical water and wastewater services remain operational and fully compliant with all provincial regulations. We have highly qualified internal staff and contractors, many with Level 4 certification, managing these systems and ensuring the continued delivery of these critical services. Emergency response, sampling and spill response remains active and effective.

Despite the current dispute, the City’s responsibility to the heath and safety of the public remains unwavering.

Though we approach the fifth week of the labour disruption, I want residents to know: our door remains open. We are ready and open to continued dialogue. We are willing to return to the negotiating table at any time. It’s the only path to a resolution that works for everyone — for employees, for the City and for the people we all serve.

To Hamilton residents: thank you for your continued patience. I understand how difficult and frustrating labour disruptions can be. Please know that your water remains safe, essential services are being delivered, and the City is doing everything it can to bring this dispute to a fair and timely end.

Let’s return to the table. Let’s get back to work — together.

Response from Minister of Industry's Office to Mayor Horwath's Press Release

We reached out to the Minister Joly, Minister of Industry Canada for a response to Mayor Horwath's press release and plea, found here. 

Joanna Kanga, Conseillère principale en communications | Affaires étrangères,  Senior Communications Advisor | Foreign Affairs, responded as follows:

The illegal and unjustified US tariffs threaten the livelihoods of workers on both sides of the border. Canadians will not be bullied; we are going to fight these tariffs, protect our workers and industries, and build the strongest economy in in the G7 - with Canadian steel.

Statement from Mayor Andrea Horwath on the Closure of ArcelorMittal Long Products Mill

HAMILTON, ON - I am deeply concerned for the wellbeing of the workers and their families who are now facing the devastating news of the ArcelorMittal Long Products Mill closure in Hamilton. This is a serious blow to our community, with immediate and lasting impacts on people’s lives.

This closure underscores the urgent need for action from the federal government. I implore them to prioritize Hamilton - one of the most significantly impacted cities in Canada. Once layoff notices are issued, and a plant goes dark, it’s too late.

The workers affected by this decision deserve more than words, they need immediate assistance. Hamilton has powered this country for generations. Now it’s time for the federal government to step up and make sure Hamilton isn’t left behind.

City Manager Accountability: Reaffirming the Call for a Formal Performance Contract

In a previously published opinion piece — available here — The Hamiltonian put forward the view that the City Manager should be subject to a formal performance contract. We recommended that such a contract include clearly negotiated, outcome-based targets and performance metrics. We also emphasized the importance of strong customer service standards as a key component of effective municipal governance, given that customer service is foundational to the public’s experience with city services.

Our position on this matter remains unchanged. We continue to assert that the introduction of a formal performance contract, as outlined in our article, would significantly enhance transparency, accountability, and good governance at City Hall.

In that context, we reached out to the Office of the Mayor with the following question:

May we get the Mayor’s thoughts on the article linked to below and whether she will consider its recommendations?
http://www.thehamiltonian.net/2025/05/statecraft-accountability-it-starts-at.html?m=1

We received the following response from Mayor Horwath’s office:

Thank you for sharing your recommendations in response to the City Manager’s May 9 responses regarding performance goals and accountability.

As noted, the City Manager’s objectives are developed in collaboration with the mayor and reflect Council-approved priorities for this term.

While there is no formal, public-facing performance contract, the approach is rooted in transparency, responsiveness, and accountability — values that Mayor Horwath continues to champion.

Your recommendations have been shared and will be considered alongside other feedback received as part of the Mayor’s Taskforce on Transparency and Accountability, surrounding ongoing discussions on governance and performance.

The Hamiltonian thanks Mayor Horwath for her response and reiterates its support for implementing a formalized performance contract as a practical and necessary tool for ensuring measurable progress and public trust.

Keeping Kroetsch

The Hamiltonian maintains a neutral stance regarding the outcome of the Ontario Civilian Police Commission’s investigation into a complaint alleging a breach of its Code of Conduct by Ward 2 Councillor Cameron Kroetsch. However, we find the prolonged duration of the process—during which Councillor Kroetsch remains suspended from his role on the Hamilton Police Services Board—concerning and arguably bordering on unfairness.

In the interest of public accountability and transparency, we reached out to the Ontario Solicitor General  Inspectorate of Policing.for an update on the status of the investigation. Below is the Q\&A exchange:

In March 2024, Councillor Kroetsch was temporarily suspended by the Ontario Civilian Police Commission (OCPC) in response to a complaint alleging a breach of its code of conduct. We understand that additional factors may have emerged during the course of the investigation, further shaping its scope. 

Over a year has now passed, and members of the Hamilton community may reasonably question why the matter remains unresolved. Given that Councillor Kroetsch has, during this time, been unable to fully carry out his responsibilities on the Police Services Board, does the protracted timeline raise concerns for you regarding the composition and functioning of the Board? Additionally, can you advise whether the matter is nearing resolution?

Please note: We are not requesting details of the investigation, which we fully recognize are confidential. Our questions are limited to the process and anticipated timelines for outcome.

The Inspector General of Policing, supported by the staff at the Inspectorate of Policing (IoP), is mandated to advise, monitor, and inspect police services, police service boards, Ontario Provincial Police detachment boards and special constable employers to ensure compliance with Ontario’s Community Safety and Policing Act (CSPA) and its regulations. The IoP is also mandated to deal with complaints about adequate and effective policing, the policies and services of boards and chiefs of police, and allegations of misconduct by police service board members. Where the Inspector General determines there has been non-compliance by a police service, board or board member, they have the authority to issue direction or measures to address the non-compliance.

The IoP’s Police Service Advisors actively monitor and provide advice to municipal police service boards, such as the Hamilton Police Service Board, to assist with meeting their legislative obligations and navigating local issues within the CSPA framework. Despite Member Kroetsch's current suspension, the Board maintains a quorum, continues to meet regularly, and makes decisions in its meetings.

Matters that were referred to the Ontario Civilian Police Commission (OCPC) prior to the CSPA coming into force do not generally fall under the Inspector General’s purview. For more information about OCPC's investigation and process, please contact the OCPC via Tribunals Ontario at Media.TO-TDO@ontario.ca.

The Hamiltonian thanks the Inspector General of Policing staff for their reply, but remains concerned. While the response provides a general overview of the Inspectorate of Policing’s (IoP) mandate and clarifies that the matter falls outside its jurisdiction because it was referred before the new legislation took effect, it fails to address whether the matter is nearing resolution. Further, we initially approached the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency of Ontario (LECA), who referred us to the Inspector General of Policing

We continue to hope that a fair and timely outcome will be reached. While the Inspector General of Policing’s office rightly notes that the Police Services Board continues to meet, maintains quorum, and makes decisions as required, it remains true that each Board member—Councillor Kroetsch included—brings a unique and valuable perspective to the table. At present, Councillor Kroetsch is unable to contribute his voice to these important discussions and decisions.

Media Release: The Hamilton Police Services Board Addresses Charter Rights

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

JUNE 9, 2025

THE HAMILTON POLICE SERVICE BOARD ADDRESSES CHARTER RIGHTS

DISCUSSION FROM ITS MAY, 29, 2025 PUBLIC MEETING

The Hamilton Police Service Board (Board) is providing clarity on recent media reports regarding a Charter Rights motion that was included on its May 29, 2025 public agenda. Charter Rights matters were discussed in detail by both the Board and Hamilton Police Service at the public meeting of May 29, 2025. The Board takes this opportunity to highlight its ongoing commitment to transparency, education and governance responsibilities related to human rights in policing.

Board Commitment to Human Rights and Training

The Board values opportunities to expand their knowledge of current and emerging police and human rights-related issues. In accordance with the Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019 (the Act) s.35.(2), the Board is compliant with required training. This training includes education on Board roles and responsibilities, as well as education that “promotes recognition and respect for the diverse, multiracial and multicultural character of Ontario society and the rights and cultures of First Nation, Inuit and Métis Peoples”. Over and above this training, the Board organizes additional Board member education sessions on an annual basis related to legal, governance and police-related matters.

Board Collaboration with the Ontario Human Rights Commission

At its public meeting on March 28, 2025, the Board unanimously passed a motion to collaborate with the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) on future training and policy development. The motion includes:
 

An invitation to the OHRC to provide education and resources at an upcoming public Board meeting, with participation from the Board, Hamilton Police Service leadership and officers.

Direction to the Chief of Police to work with the OHRC on a plan to implement human rights-focused training and policies.

A formal commitment from the Board to ongoing collaboration with the OHRC to ensure continuous learning and enhance public trust in policing.

Oversight of Member Discipline and Charter Matters

The Hamilton Police Service maintains full compliance with the Act in the investigation and reporting of member discipline. Discipline-related reports are presented to the Board in May and December of every year. Any substantiated Charter breaches investigated by the Service’s Professional Standards Division are documented in these reports.

Additionally, the Service already produces a comprehensive annual report for the Board that covers both substantiated and unsubstantiated Charter violation allegations, including public and internal complaints. Since 2021, there has been a 718 percent increase in overall training, which includes charter issues, search and seizure, court testimony and notetaking.

The Chief of Police also provides updates on any new or ongoing Charter matters to the Board at its monthly public meetings.

The Service continues to demonstrate proactive communication in relation to Charter breaches with the Board, the community and its service members.

Board Governance and Oversight Responsibilities

The Board’s role respecting officer misconduct includes making sure policies are in place to manage complaints effectively. The Board’s ‘Policy on Complaints of Misconduct (P- 018)’, enacted April 1, 2024, ensures compliance with its responsibilities under the Act and reinforces its governance oversight responsibilities.

The Board remains committed to strengthening its governance practices and welcomes opportunities for continuous improvement. Meeting recordings, reports and presentations are publicly available on the Board’s website.

For more information, please contact the Board’s Executive Director Kirsten Stevenson.
 

The Hamilton Police Service Board is the civilian body governing the Hamilton Police Service. Through the Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019, the Board is responsible for ensuring the delivery of adequate and effective policing in Hamilton and to provide accountability to the public through governance activities that contribute to locally responsive policing.

Board Members: Chair Don Robertson, Vice Chair Esther Pauls, Andrea Horwath, Cameron Kroetsch, Anjali Menezes and Shaun Padulo

Administrative Team: Executive Director Kirsten Stevenson and Administrative Assistant Lucia Romano

Phone: 905-546-2727 Email: kirsten.stevenson@hamilton.ca Address: 155 King William Street Hamilton, ON L8R 1A7

Website: www.hamiltonpsb.ca

With Ward 10 Councillor Jeff Beattie

Enjoy our conversation with Ward 10 Councillor Jeff Beattie. Jeff, thank you for engaging with Hamiltonians through The Hamiltonian and congratulations on your well-earned induction as a full member of the Star Wards club!

You were successful in your bid for election in Ward 10, from a long-serving incumbent, which places you in a unique position. What specific challenges have you faced in taking over a ward with such history, and how have you navigated them? 

The biggest challenge was trying to understand the direction that my predecessor was headed, in terms of what vision they had for the community, what projects they were working on for the community, things of that nature. I’m a big believer in continuity. Unfortunately, there was no ‘passing of torch’ – not to say that was expected, but we (I include my terrific office team in this) had to try and figure that all out and rebuild every file from scratch. I would liken it to learning to fly a plane as you’re trying to assemble it.

How would you describe your approach to governance, and in what ways has your style supported your effectiveness as a city councillor?

My approach has been formed over the years by my different roles as a School Board Trustee, Business Owner and Community Volunteer. I like to break down complex issues into their basic forms, in plain language, and filter out what I refer to as ‘noise’. This helps me focus on the actual task – the goal of the conversation, and not the distractions that sometimes surround them. I think this helps me in my decision making, as well as being able to explain issues and concepts to my Constituents in uncomplicated terms.

What key lessons have you learned from your more seasoned colleagues on council, and what perspectives or practices have you introduced that you believe could benefit your peers?

I’m always thankful for the wise counsel and advise of the veteran members of Council, particularly in the early days of navigating City Hall. I was very fortunate to hire an experienced office administrator who already knew who to call and when – enabling me to ‘hit the ground running’ when I took office (save and except for issues explained in the first question). Some of the new practices that I’ve brought to Ward 10 include social media communications, email newsletters, improved print newsletters, a Satellite Ward Office (at Old Stoney Creek City Hall), establishing a Youth Council, and holding Townhalls on multiple topics. I’ve noticed that some Councillors have adopted similar practices, but I wouldn’t be so bold as to take credit for being a trail-blazer or trend-setter in any way.

What would you identify as the top three challenges currently facing Ward 10, and what strategies are you employing to address them? 

In no particular order 1)Preparing for the pressures of growth as planned in the Stoney Creek Urban Boundary Expansion (SCUBE) Plan and Fruitland-Winona Secondary Plan: Working with City Staff to keep growth related projects such as Barton Street Widening, Creation of new Parks, Building new recreation centres and spaces, Transit expansion, etc. – on schedule (which so far, they are not). Keeping Community members up-to-date on the more than 33 major development proposals currently on the books, as well as communicating the status of the previously mentioned growth related projects to the Community.

2)Renewal of aging infrastructure: Working again with City Staff to support and inform current and future road renewal projects and ensuring resident input is reflected in how these projects are prioritized. Working with City Parks Staff to continue our Ward 10 Park Rehabilitation Plan (which is working to reduce the backlog on Capital Investment in our older parks). Connecting incomplete pedestrian and cycling networks, such as the historic lack of sidewalk connections over 5 out of 6 QEW Overpass Bridges that have isolated the neighbourhoods north of the QEW

3)Working to find efficiencies within the City’s operations to reduce the tax burden on Ward 10 residents: With nearly 6% tax increases in every year of the last three years (which I voted against – for the record), the pressure on our local taxpayers is reaching a breaking point. I’ve worked hard with my colleagues to

The Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Industry Visit to Hamilton

The Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Industry, will visit ArcelorMittal Dofasco to meet with leadership and workers. 

She will be joined by Members of Parliament Lisa Hepfner (Hamilton Mountain), John-Paul Danko (Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas), and Aslam Rana (Hamilton Centre).

Date: Friday, June 6, 2025
Time: 11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. EDT
Location: ArcelorMittal Dofasco, 1330 Burlington Street East, Hamilton, ON
Duration: Approx. 2 hours

With Dr. Robin Lennox- (MPP) for Hamilton Centre

Enjoy our chat with Dr. Robin Lennox, Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) for Hamilton Centre, NDP Party.

As a practising family physician specializing in addiction medicine, do you continue to serve in a clinical capacity while holding elected office? If so, how do you balance the demands of both roles, and in what ways has your medical background informed your work as an MPP?

I have always loved my clinical work as a physician and I believe healthcare providers offer an incredible service to their communities. Since taking on the role of Member of Provincial Parliament, my time is quite limited but I will continue a small amount of clinical work in order to stay connected to the reality of healthcare on the ground and continue to serve my community as a physician. Often, this means picking up weekend shifts or covering clinic in lieu of vacation time. Access to healthcare—particularly in areas such as wait times, hospital capacity, and mental health services—remains a pressing concern for many Hamilton residents. 

Given your dual expertise in medicine and public service, what solutions do you propose to improve access and outcomes across the healthcare system?

First, we need to ensure that every person in Hamilton has access to a family physician, preferably in a team-based care model which we know is cost-effective and associated with positive health outcomes. In order to achieve this, we need to increase our provincial funding for community-based care, including expanding funding for family health teams and ensuring that all team members (nurses, counsellors, physiotherapists, etc) receive adequate compensation in order to stay in their essential roles. We also need to reduce the administrative burden that family physicians face (often 20 hrs per week on top of their full-time clinical schedule) and move away from a business entrepreneurship model so that doctor’s graduating from medical school are more likely to choose a career in family medicine.

To address emergency department wait times and hallway healthcare, we need to invest in a few key areas. First, we need to ensure that the base funding for our hospitals are expanded to match their capacity needs – for example, hospitals in Hamilton are often at 120% of inpatient bed capacity. What that means is that for the additional 20%, there are no funded beds or funded nursing support. This places additional strain on hospitals by shifting patients into “unconventional spaces” like hallways, but also means our nurses are having to cover more patients than they are intended to – leading to burnout. By increasing the base funding for hospitals to match the volume of admitted patients they are caring for each day, we could address this short-fall and improve care received in hospital. We could also creatively invest in infrastructure and re-development to ensure that hospitals are able to use their spaces most efficiently.

But in order to address the acute care crunch, we also need to ensure that there are safe community spaces for people to be discharged to after acute hospitalization. Many patients are kept in hospital for prolonged stays because of the lack of long-term care spaces available and lengthy waitlists. If we invested in quality, not-for-profit long-term care homes in Hamilton and expanded their capacity, this would alleviate some of the outflow issues currently being experienced in our Hamilton hospitals.  

Affordability continues to be a significant challenge for Hamiltonians, encompassing housing, food, utilities, and other basic needs. What provincial measures are currently underway—or being proposed—to help alleviate the financial strain on local families?

Unfortunately, the current Conservative government has failed to put forward any legislation that addresses the affordability crisis. But, there are a number of things we could and should be doing to alleviate the financial strain on our local families.

First, we could immediately amend the Residential Tenancies Act to ensure there is rent control on all

Comparative Spotlight: Andrea Horwath vs. Fred Eisenberger — Front-Page Coverage in The Hamilton Spectator

A recent comparative review by The Hamiltonian reveals that former Mayor Fred Eisenberger was featured on the front page of The Hamilton Spectator nearly twice as often as current Mayor Andrea Horwath, when adjusting for the time they’ve each served.

Measuring the Media Presence 

Using a proportional lens, the study examined the first 32 months of Mayor Horwath’s term (October 2022–June 2025) and compared it to a similar span during Eisenberger’s final term (October 2014–May 2017). Only news stories on the front page were counted—excluding opinion pieces and letters. Both digital and print editions were considered.

Eisenberger’s higher media visibility coincided with high-stakes debates, including the light rail transit (LRT) project, city revitalization plans, and the Pan Am Games—each of which earned multiple front-page placements. In contrast, Horwath’s front-page moments have centered around her historic election as Hamilton’s first female mayor and key policy matters like steel tariffs and housing.

Takeaway

Though both mayors have been pivotal in shaping Hamilton’s trajectory, their media profiles—at least in The Spectator's front-page real estate—reveal different narratives. Eisenberger’s early term reflected a combative, high-profile era; Horwath’s to date suggests a quieter, steadier path through Hamilton’s evolving landscape.

Mayor Horwath On Tariff Increases

Statement from Mayor Horwath on Increased Tariffs

HAMILTON, ON - The latest U.S.-imposed tariffs are another blow to Hamilton’s economy, workers, and families - and especially to our steel industry.

Steel has been the backbone of Hamilton for generations. These tariffs don’t just target materials - they put thousands of good jobs at risk. They create uncertainty for workers, delay investment, and threaten the stability our industries need to thrive.

This is not just about trade - It’s about real people. Hamiltonians working in steel mills, in fabricating and advanced manufacturing, on shop floors, and across our supply chain are now facing a hollowing out of their industry with orders drying up, stalled projects, and real anxiety about what comes next.

We need urgent, coordinated action from all levels of government. That includes immediate support for impacted sectors, and faster movement on housing and infrastructure dollars - with clear timelines that allow businesses to prepare and workers to plan.

In Hamilton, we’re stepping up:

We’ve strengthened our Buy Canadian Procurement Policy to support local jobs.
We’re convening Tariff Roundtables with industry leaders to shape local responses.
And I’m in active talks with provincial and federal leaders to ensure Hamilton’s voice is heard and workers and companies are protected.

This isn’t just about Hamilton. It’s about safeguarding the future of integrated trade, shared prosperity, and economic security.

Hamilton’s steel industry built this city’s prosperity. It deserves leadership that has its back. That’s what I’m committed to - today and every day. I will continue to fight for smart, fair, and stable trade that supports people and businesses, and secures our shared future.

Tapping in: With Greg Hoath: Business Manager for the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA) and the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 772

In light of the ongoing strike regarding water services, we checked in with Business Manager for the Hamilton Ontario Water Employees Association (HOWEA) and the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 772 in Hamilton, Ontario. Here is our Q/A with Greg:

You had indicated to the city that they are fully aware of what it would take to end thes strike. Can you share with Hamiltonians what you think it would take to end it. What is the impasse and why is it important to your members that the city meet your requirements in that regard?

The City was made aware of the issues in 2004 when deciding whether to renew the Public Private Partnership with American Water or to take back in house. We met with each councillor and the Mayor. The two issues were raised 8 years ago without any resolution. Finally 4 years ago at bargaining, we notified the City the two issues would be the union’s only proposals - 1. Internal Parity with trades and operators, with our members requiring much higher certification but much lower paid; 2. A certification system that never worked under private operator and at best requires about 10 years to achieve a top rate that is below market. We cannot retain or attract certified operators or trades and are under manned. The cost would be about $300000 to settle, represents less than 0.01% of the City budget. City staff blame their mandate and have stated “what do we tell the large CUPE Local 5167, why we gave you more”

2. Is there any truth that striking workers have been somewhat disruptive. If so, is it in the sense that typically happens when strikes are enacted (in terms of mild forms of protest resistance), or, are you concerned that things may be reaching a boiling point. What instructions do your members get with respect to strike protocols?

Prior to the strike the IUOE held strike protocol meetings and provided information like Picket Captain Duties, FAQ’s and Do’s & Dont’s. We have legally picketed various City properties - 700 Woodward Water & Wastewater Facilities, 330 Wentworth Water Distribution Hub, City Hall and held an information picket at HSR Upper James where we held no buses contrary to the stories reported. Police have been called numerous times by a strike breaking security company, hired by the City at an astronomical cost to taxpayers, without any issues. 

We have conducted ourselves within the law and professionally. In fact, we informed residents of odour problems, brown water and no water in Stoney Creek. We are not having an issue other than some cars hitting picketers. Unfortunately, some anger is expected. However, the support has been overwhelming as most citizens tell us they have little faith in the City administration

The members are committed to finally reaching fairness in their agreement and their resolve is stronger than ever.We would rather be working than on strike and remain concerned with the operation and maintenance of such a critical service to all Hamiltonians

 Thanks Greg. We wish you and your members all the best and hope that a deal with be made soon.  

 Photo by Deborah L Carlson on Unsplash

Badge of Honour- Featuring Clr. Pauls

The role of a City Councillor—and that of their dedicated support staff—can be demanding. With back-to-back meetings, countless emails and phone calls, and interview requests from media outlets like The Hamiltonian, the pace can be relentless. That’s why, every now and then, a little light-hearted silliness is not only welcome—it’s important!

Councillor Esther Pauls, ever the good sport, recently received a custom badge sent to every Councillor who participated in our Hamiltonian interview series and earned a spot in our Star Wards list. The badge, which reads “I am not on The Hamiltonian’s Most Wanted List,” is a tongue-in-cheek badge of honour celebrating those Councillors who made time to engage with the public through The Hamiltonian.

Enjoy this delightful photo of Councillor Pauls proudly wearing her badge—proof that civic duty and a sense of humour go hand in hand.

Now, the real questions:

Will those on The Most Wanted List turn themselves in by accepting our interview invitation?
Will Mayor Horwath wear her badge of honour and share a photo—injured wrist or not?
And will more Councillors rise to the occasion and send in a proud badge-wearing pic?

Only time will tell… as The Hamiltonian continues to patrol the Hall. 😉

The Coveted Badge

 

Media Release; From Fire Chief

Just before 5:00 am this morning, the Hamilton Fire Department received a report of a possible house explosion and fire at #22 Tuxedo Avenue North between Main St. East and Dunsmure Road. First arriving crews reported a fully involved, partially collapsed residential structure located at #18 Tuxedo Avenue. Given the volume of fire and the exposure to homes on either side, the alarm was quickly upgraded to a multiple alarm, bringing resources from across the City to the scene. 

On scene firefighters quickly initiated aerial operations along with the deployment of large volume hose lines to cover the exposures and begin to extinguish the fire. Houses on either side of the involved home were searched by firefighters and the occupants were evacuated. Due to the significant structural damage to the involved house, firefighters were not able to enter it to complete a search. During the incident with the help of neighbours and the Police, it was determined that the occupants were not at home at the time of the incident and were safe. Based on the suspected nature of the incident, the Ontario Fire Marshal’s Office has been notified and is responding Investigators to the scene. 

Currently firefighters are still at the scene performing fire watch. The involved home sustained significant fire and structural collapse is expected to be complete loss. Damage to the homes on either side appears to be minor. The evacuated occupants from the two homes have been allowed to return. The Red Cross has been notified to the impacted occupants of #18. At the time of writing damage estimates are expected to be in excess of $500,000.00. No injuries have been reported 

No additional information will be provided

David R. (Dave) Cunliffe (he/him)

Fire Chief
Hamilton Fire Department

What is it Like to Be an Undercover Police Officer

 
Welcome Paul Manning, a former undercover police officer in Hamilton Ontario and author. Paul is a member of the International Association of Undercover Officers and a member of the International Police Association

1. Can you briefly summarize your career in policing, including the roles you’ve held, when, and in which jurisdictions or units?

I’ve had the privilege of working internationally across three continents in various major policing units since the early 1990s. My career has taken me through assignments in Homicide, Anti-Terrorism, and Special Victims Units, but my primary expertise lies in covert operations. From the outset, I specialized in undercover work, often embedded in long-term, high-risk investigations targeting organized crime and violent offenders.

2. Given the inherently high-risk nature of undercover operations, what key factors must align to ensure both the safety and success of an assignment? Conversely, what circumstances can quickly escalate into dangerous or compromised situations?

Undercover operations are built on a delicate balance of planning, control, and adaptability. To ensure both safety and success, several key factors must align: solid intelligence, a clearly defined objective, robust operational support, and a tightly controlled cover story. Trust between handlers and the operative is paramount — you need a team that not only plans meticulously but can react swiftly when things shift. Regular check-ins, pre-established signals, and layered contingency plans are critical.

Conversely, the environment can become dangerous very quickly when there are gaps in intel, poor supervision, or pressure to take shortcuts. Emotional investment, mission creep, or loss of objectivity can compromise judgment. I've seen operations unravel due to lack of communication or when supervisors don't fully grasp the realities on the ground.

3. Is there specialized training required to become an undercover officer? If so, can you describe the nature, scope, and intensity of that preparation?