;;

Monday, December 22, 2025

Water (Rate) Budget- The Hamiltonian's View

The City of Hamilton’s adoption of its 2026 Water (Rate) Budget reflects a familiar municipal balancing act: the tension between long-term infrastructure stewardship and near-term affordability for residents. On paper, the budget is coherent and defensible. It acknowledges the city’s aging water, wastewater, and stormwater systems and commits to sustained capital reinvestment in assets valued at more than $14.6 billion. From an asset-management perspective, continued rate increases were inevitable.

That said, the final outcome exposes the limits of Council’s ability—or willingness—to fundamentally rethink how these costs are distributed. The approved 7.32 per cent rate increase, higher than the mayor’s proposed 5.82 per cent but lower than the initial 10 per cent forecast, lands in a politically convenient middle ground. While the City emphasizes monthly savings compared to the original forecast, for many households this framing obscures the cumulative impact of repeated annual increases that are now projected to average roughly seven per cent well into the next decade.

The deferral of the Stormwater Management Fee to January 2027 is arguably the most consequential policy decision in this budget. While it offers short-term relief, it also postpones a more structural conversation about fairness—particularly whether stormwater costs should continue to be embedded in water rates rather than allocated based on impervious surface area or land use. Mayor Andrea Horwath’s public dissent underscores this unresolved issue and highlights the absence of a city-wide, progressive funding model that better aligns cost with impact.

Administratively, the budget aligns with established asset-management plans and reflects continuity in approach rather than innovation. As City Manager Marnie Cluckie notes, the plan is “responsible” and “forward-looking,” but it is also incremental. For residents, the key question is not whether Hamilton must invest in its water systems—it must—but whether Council has exhausted all options to do so more equitably. 

The Hamiltonian

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.

This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.