;;

Monday, February 27, 2017

With Paul Johnson- on The Bay Street LRT Stop

Enjoy our chat with LRT Project Director Paul Johnson, on the topic of the possible Bay Street stop. 

In August 2016, The Hamiltonian interviewed officials from Portland Oregon to get some insights into their LRT experience and lessons learned. This exchange could be seen here: http://www.thehamiltonian.net/2016/08/a-portland-perspective-on-lrt_23.html

When asked specifically about lessons learned and things to watch out for, one of the pieces of advice is quoted below:

"Probably the biggest lesson I've learned, is as we build extensions to the line, be careful of how many stations you put in. The number of stations and the travel times...so, it's a combination of how often do you stop and how important the stations are. We basically have a very long line and to get from one end to the other takes you a long time. So, be careful about the number of stations you put in. I think you need to find a balance between what's there today, what can you imagine can be there in the future, what are great bus connections, ...but everybody wants a station and you need to be frugal with those as you look at that extension. Make sure you're smart about when you're putting those in. Because it's really about high capacity transit. It's not a bus. There's a tool for every kind of transit.

In light of this, and assuming LRT proceeds, and in the context of a contemplated Bay street stop, can

you list for us the most compelling reasons why Bay street should get a stop. Can you also list the top risks of doing so.

The request for a Bay Street stop came from the business community. Please see the letter from the Hamilton Chamber of Commerce, agenda item 8.1 at the link below.

http://hamilton.siretechnologies.com/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=1090&amp%3Bamp%3Bdoctype=AGENDA

The LRT project team was directed by Council to report back on the feasibility of adding a stop at Bay Street; we did not complete a benefits case analysis and did not make a formal recommendation.

Having said that, there is a potential for economic uplift and the stop would connect to key destinations like First Ontario Centre, Standard Life building, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, City Hall, etc. The goal of connecting riders with key destinations is in keeping with the City’s vision for Rapid Transit.

Adding a stop would increase the project budget and the impact on property. Those are the two key risks in my mind. The estimated cost of construction is $2.6M and at the moment we do not have an estimate on the property acquisition costs.

What do you say to those who are worried about scope creep and cost containment, relative to the Bay street proposed stop?

We certainly understand those concerns. If Council were to approve the Bay Street stop it would still be subject to Metrolinx approval and would be contingent on the project budget. Overall, however, it does not pose any significant challenges to completing this project in the timeframe we have committed to.

If the Bay St. stop goes forward, what is the estimated expropriation costs?

We do not have a cost estimate at this time but an additional stop at Bay Street would require partial property acquisition from four properties totalling approximately 0.13 acres, as well as full acquisition of one additional property (approximately 0.24 acres).

What criteria is being used to make stop selections? For example,why Bay over McNab? Why Mary over Bay to this point?


The majority of the LRT stops have been planned since the 2011 Environmental Assessment process which included significant public consultation. The only changes are as follows and are based on community and stakeholder input: 

The Gage Park/Delta stop was initially removed by the project team but was added back in after we received significant community feedback during our Public consultation in September 2016.


Moved two stops to bookend the International Village (stops at Mary and Wellington)
Staff was directed by the LRT Subcommittee to review the feasibility of adding another stop at Bay Street.

Stops are strategically located along the route for access by walking, cycling and north-south bus routes. They also are designed to help connect riders to key destinations.

It is important to note that most urban LRT systems incorporate closer stop spacing in the downtown area. Currently our spacing in the downtown area averages just over 600m between stops. The addition of a Bay St. stop would lower our stop spacing to an average of 450m in the downtown area which is consistent with urban LRT systems. Outside of the downtown area our stop spacing averages around 880m which is again consistent with urban LRT systems outside of the downtown area.

Thanks Paul for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian. 

5 comments:

  1. much ado about not much. In the end, few will be satisfied with what will be imposed, so perhaps in frustration and regret we will find some common ground. I thought the most interesting aspect was watching Lloyd bow out, while Terry stepped in. This council's version of the "Hokey Pokey"
    I admire Mr. Johnson. He has handled a difficult file with tact and professionalism.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope Terry and Donna have not given in. The more I think about laying tracks down and ripping up land and infrastructure, the more I think how archaic this whole thing is.
    Sorce

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I watched Skelly on "City Matters" with Doug Farraway last night (interesting dynamic watching vanquished interview victor) and I don't think we need worry about Donna "giving in" any time soon, in fact I thought she made it clear she intends to increase the pressure and demand accountability respecting how that money is spent.
      The residents of Ward 7 deserve some sort of reward for injecting fresh, focused, courageous perspective to the Municipal political scene.

      Delete
  3. 22 March 2016: “[Skelly] vowed to "ruffle a few feathers" on council – but also support decisions already made, like a commitment to LRT.” http://www.thespec.com/news-story/6400355-ward-7-chooses-former-chch-personality-donna-skelly/

    3 April 2016: Skelly says improving public transit on the Mountain is a priority and she doesn’t want to see improvements put on the back burner while the LRT is being constructed in the lower city. “A lot of attention, a lot of money is going to be going toward the lower part of the city while we roll out the LRT, but we cannot lose sight of the fact that people above the escarpment want and need better transit service,” she says. http://www.hamiltonnews.com/news-story/6425459-reporting-for-duty-donna-skelly-takes-office-as-hamilton-ward-7-councillor/

    You can be critical yet still constructive. I trust that councillors will find it in themselves to turn $1.1B in provincial infrastructure investment in Hamilton into a good news story.

    Noted

    ReplyDelete
  4. Term Limits NowMarch 01, 2017

    I think Skelly has shown that she's not afraid to take on issues and people. Her position on hydro and suggestion that Eisenberger and Pearson donate the stipend they receive is commendable. If only Eisenberger and Pearson would follow Skelly's lead. They won't though.

    I'm back

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints, spirited discussion and even pointed comments are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will simply not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.


Comments posted on this blog, may be used as excerpts in whole or in part, in other media sources .
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.