 |
| Click on Picture to enlarge it |
Conclusion:
This labour dispute is centred on differing interpretations of fairness and fiscal responsibility. The City emphasizes consistency and cost containment, while the union highlights pay equity, working conditions, and recruitment/retention challenges. Both sides claim readiness to negotiate but accuse each other of obstruction and misrepresentation. Resolution hinges on whether the City will reconsider its mandate in light of the union’s narrower, equity-based demands.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.
Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.