The Eisenberger "tapegate" investigation and the corresponding investigation into the conduct of Councilor Clark, have cost the taxpayers of Hamilton $128,603.08.
Both investigations were completely unnecessary had both gentlemen abided by the code of coduct.
Both made a very serious and costly mistake. While intent has been offered as a defense in both cases, these defenses aren't compelling. Moreover, it's the impact that counts.
$128,603.08, could have bought a lot of food for those who are on ODSP, Ontario Works or the working poor.
While I thought the reprimands resulting from these investigations were rather "light", the impacts as described above, should weigh heavily.
On balance, I continue to respect Mayor Eisenberger and Councilor Clark. Their respective lapses in judgment however, have not served us well. That balance is fragile.
Saturday, August 15, 2009
4 comments:
Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.
This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.
Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I applaud Fred for trying to clear up misinformation. As far as Clark, he is arrogant and self motivated. If the former communications manager of Fred's office really cared about this city he'd drop his lawsuit. What a waste of time. He took a recording of a conversation obtained through his employment with the City and picked a self serving politician to distribute it. If only the position paid more, I'd run against Clark to rid the City of such a politician.
ReplyDeleteWhat I want to know is why Mr Clark is not paying this bill? Why should the taxpayers be on the hook for his foolishness?
ReplyDeleteUnder the legislation he could have been fined up to 90 days pay for breaking the law. Instead the report was used like a rolled up newspaper, bad doggy. But the bill, a real eye opener that was.
ReplyDeleteMAW: In response I would say, what was the point of this exercise then if there is no punishment?
ReplyDeleteYet a person who is on Ontario Works who collects beer bottles for extra money can be put under the microscope for earning a few bucks or even if friends or family give you some extra money for food, that is a no no as well, as you must report this and to have those extra earnings penalized.
Justice, there is no justice.